African Press International (API)

"Daily Online News Channel".

Archive for February 18th, 2008

Did Bush accept to share power with Al Gore in the US?

Posted by African Press International on February 18, 2008

New comment on your post #4316 “Bush realises that he cannot force a solution on Kenyans”
Author : pkinyari (IP: 41.222.13.131 , 41.222.13.131)

Commentary:
It is strange that Bush who never shared Power with Al Gore when there was election dispute in Florida can now advice on the way forward in Kenya, which strangely is different from the path republican choose then. Sample this;

How Bush Lost Florida But Won – In The Supreme Court And The Media

by jerry politex, www.bushwatch.com

Ever since Bush was selected by the Supreme Court by a vote of 5-4 to take over the U.S. presidency, the Dems have said that a fair and thorough recounting of the Florida vote would prove that Gore won. While the jury is still out on whether the reported Consortium recount, published late Sunday November 11, was fair and thorough, let’s assume that it was. What does it tell us? It tells us that Gore won the Florida electoral vote, the U.S. Supreme Court took the presidency away from him, and the media is wrong in reporting otherwise. Here’s how Bush lost Florida.

First, it is an established fact that Gore beat Bush in the national popular vote by over a half million votes. Secondly, Consortium interpretations of the voting data conclude that thousands more people voted for Gore in Florida than Bush. The problem for Gore is that many more votes in his favor, such as the Palm Beach butterfly votes, were declared invalid than similar votes for Bush. Third, discounting such unretrievable invalid votes, Consortium interpretations, which allow only fully-punched ballot cards and correctly marked optical scaned ballots, conclude that Gore still beat Bush in a statewide recount in Florida by a thin margin of over 100 votes. Which brings us back to the Supreme Court decision.

In its Dec. 12 decision the Supreme Court indicated that its conclusions were based upon equal protection law, and decided that in order to have equal voter protection in Florida the entire state should be recounted. However, even though there were weeks left for such a recount prior to the formal reception of the states’ electoral college votes in Congress, the court decided that there wasn’t enough time for such a recount, so five of nine members of the court decided, along party lines, to select Bush as the winner in Florida. The Consortium data indicates that they were wrong to think that Bush had won the popular vote in Florida. At any rate, in its Dec. 12 decision the Court made clear that if it hadn’t selected Bush, its fallback decision would have been to call for a statewide election, since it considered the case to be a matter of equal rights. It further indicated that not taking a position on the matter was not an option.

Strangely, not one media member of the Consortium has reached the conclusion that if the Supreme Court had not selected Bush, Gore would have won the election by a Florida recount. Instead, in every instance of Consortium reporting, the big headlines say the data shows Bush won with more “valid votes,” that he won because of the partial recount mandated by the Florida Supreme Court, or that he won because he would have had more votes than Gore under Gore’s recount request. Buried in some of the stories are the six ways that Gore could have won. However, all of these suppositions are moot.

The unvarnished fact is that the U.S. Supreme Court had the final say on the election, not the Consortium voting data, and, left with the choice of giving the election back to the people of Florida through a statewide recount or selecting Bush, they selected Bush. That’s what makes the New York Times headline for the Consortium story particularly egregious: “Study of Disputed Florida Ballots Finds Justices Did Not Cast The Deciding Vote.” While the headline represents a badly needed attempt to restore credibility to the U.S. Supreme Court, it fails on the facts and it fails because the media cannot do what the Court, itself, has failed to do since its politicized decision in the case of Bush vs. Gore.

(c) copyright 2001. May be reprinted with attribution and link to www.bushwatch.com

Published by Korir, API africanpress@getmail.no

About these ads

Posted in AA > News and News analysis | Leave a Comment »

Long fight for change and link to crisis

Posted by African Press International on February 18, 2008

The ghost of constitutional reforms — which two successive regimes failed to deal with — has re-emerged to haunt the political leadership in the middle of a post-election crisis, The Standard can report.And this on the eve of the high profile arrival today of US Secretary of State Ms Condeleezza Rice and the return of Dr Jendayi Frazer, Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs, to add impetus to the ongoing mediation talks.

Rice, an emissary of US President George Bush, will carry this message from him to President Kibaki and Orange Democratic Movement (ODM) leader Mr Raila Odinga, “…The US desires to see that there be a power-sharing arrangement that will help this nation resolve its difficulties”.

Power-sharing, now at the centre of the ongoing talks to broker a deal out of the crippling political impasse — and which could entail shifting some of the imperial powers of the presidency to another institution — is, in fact, a child of the much sought-after reforms.

Tragically, few lessons have been learnt after many years of false starts dating back to 1997, and billions of shillings gone down the drain, including a referendum on the draft Constitution which the Government lost.

But after failing to reform its constitution in peacetime, Kenya is now confronted with a fresh and even more urgent need to reform its constitution in the middle of a crisis.

Prof Yash Pal Ghai, a consultant during the search for a new constitution in the Kibaki-led National Rainbow Coalition (Narc) government, once remarked at the height of his frustration that if Kenya failed to reform its supreme document in peacetime, it somehow would still have to do so in turmoil.

The need for reforms is also in cognizance of the fact that while the mayhem that engulfed the country was a spontaneous response to the Electoral Commission of Kenya’s (ECK) declaration of Kibaki as winner of the 2007 presidential elections, a plethora of other underlying issues that have remained unresolved since Independence helped fuel it.

Mediators have conceded that the crisis cannot be resolved by merely dealing with the puzzle of who won the presidency and sharing out Cabinet positions.

With the international community backing the idea of power sharing, that has also strongly featured on the mediation table, there was no doubt at the weekend that a deal was shaping up along these lines.

New hardliners emerge

A political settlement that could usher in a new government is expected to be announced anytime this week. The talks, led by former UN secretary-general Dr Kofi Annan, former South African First Lady Mrs Graca Machel and former Tanzanian President Benjamin Mkapa, resume tomorrow.

But a new breed of status quo proponents similar to those who blocked change in Kanu’s last days of a 24-year hegemony and another that frustrated reforms for the most part during Kibaki’s first tenure as President emerged in the form of Party of National Unity (PNU) hardliners.

Power-sharing, which the international community has openly backed and is pressuring the protagonists to accept as the most viable political settlement, appeared to be deeply unsettling for PNU.

In a seemingly well choreographed fight-back, Foreign Affairs minister Mr Moses Wetangula fired the first salvo at US President George Bush — who has backed power-sharing and which idea he branded as a constitutional landmine.

“It is not possible to reach an agreement in affront to the Constitution. We have a country, laws and a Constitution. Whatever we reach as an agreement must be within the law,” Wetangula told journalists.

“Kenya will not take the road of agreements through hurried processes influenced by foreign states. We want a fully thought-out process because this is a Kenyan problem.”

In a direct response to Bush’s call for power-sharing, Wetangula lashed out: “We will not be led, guided or given conditions by foreign states on how to reach a solution to solve the political impasse in Kenya.”

And taking the cue was a group of 10 MPs from PNU and allied parties, who gathered at Hotel Boulevard and dismissed proposals on power sharing.

The MPs also told off President Bush and several envoys, including British High Commissioner Mr Adam Wood, over what they termed as, “infringing on Kenya’s sovereignty”.

“It is unacceptable that close to 45 years after independence, we shall allow foreign domination to steal the dream we had at Independence,” said part of the statement read at the press conference attended by Mr Peter Munya (Tigania East), Mrs Beth Mugo (Dagoretti), Mr Peter Mwathi (Limuru), Ms Wavinya Ndeti (Kathiani) and Mr Dick Wathika (Makadara), among others.

ODM has proposed a power sharing arrangement that will make the President head of State and Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, but cede his role as head of government to an executive prime minister, who has two deputies.

In the proposal, the President and premier are to share executive authority with proportionality at all levels of government.

PNU, however, wants the President to remain head of State and government in the event of a grand coalition, with the President appointing members of the Cabinet as he/she wishes.

The party also insists that positions already filled in the Cabinet must not be tampered with, reflecting a hardline position.

Today will represent another busy day on the talks trail, with Rice scheduled to land at 10.30am and thereafter meet with Annan at the Serena Hotel.

She will later meet President Kibaki, ODM leader Raila, and members of the civil society and business community.

Rice is expected to later brief the media before winding up her tour of Kenya.

Published by Korir, API africanpress@getmail.no source.standard.ke

Posted in AA > News and News analysis | Leave a Comment »

37 Mungiki suspects arrested

Posted by African Press International on February 18, 2008

By Cyrus OmbatiThirty-seven Mungiki suspects were arrested taking an oath after a bust up in Nairobi’s Kayole estate.

More than 200 others who had taken the oath escaped because the officers who had laid the ambush were few.

The suspects, who included a class seven pupil, said they were taking an oath before they could be taken to Rift Valley for an “event” they did not know.

Meanwhile, it emerged that a special police squad that had cracked down on the sect had been secretly disbanded.

Kwekwe Squad, which has been fighting the sect’s activities since last year, was disbanded early this month in unclear circumstances.

On Sunday, police said they were tipped that there was a group of youths taking an oath in a house and that they had been there overnight.

Witnesses said the group arrived in vehicles, bicycles and on foot and proceeded to the event that kicked off at about 2am.

The house where oath taking allegedly took place is near a stream, and this makes it easy for them to escape whenever police strike.

Kayole OCPD, Mr Leonard Omolo, said the youth were ferried from Murang’a and Maragwa.

“They have confessed that they were brought here from Murang’a and Maragwa for the event,” he said.

In the house, they slaughtered seven sheep, whose blood they used in the oath-taking event.

Also recovered were several paraphernalia, 37 pangas, literature that showed where they planned to attack, five knives, sheepskins, sufurias full of fresh blood and seven head of sheep whose eyes had been gouged out.

Some of the youth confessed that they were brought there to take an oath.

Asked what they intended to use the pangas for, the youth said the recent chaos that were witnessed in parts of the country forced them to be armed.

“There could start a fight anytime and it is good for one to be ready. It can happen anytime,” said one.

By the time police arrived, at about 9am, majority of the youth aged between 14 and 28 had taken the oath and were ready to leave.

Omolo hinted that they had been informed that the exercise has been going on for the past two days and that more youths could have taken the oath.

Police have linked the sect to the killing of a man whose headless body was found lying in the sewage system in Dandora at the weekend.

Published by Korir, API africanpress@get,ail.no source.standard.ke

Posted in AA > News and News analysis | Leave a Comment »

Police bribed in South Africa

Posted by African Press International on February 18, 2008

We spent  a night in Hillbrow. This suburb of Johannesburg South Africa  is where all immigrants converge from all over Africa. Legal or illegal immigrants.

We captured the exploitation of these people by the South African Police. We capture them on film soliciting and receiving bribes.

Andre has also done probasbly the most important story that we have done up to date. It is clear that Press Freedom in South Africa is under severe pressure and the very essence of the freedom of expression does not exist in South Africa anymore.

Posted to API by James Munro

Published by API africanpress@getmail.no

Posted in AA > News and News analysis | Leave a Comment »

Bush realises that he cannot force a solution on Kenyans

Posted by African Press International on February 18, 2008

Bush says wants to help Kenya, not dictate

Written by Claire Wanja/Reuters


U.S. President George W. Bush said on Sunday he did not want to dictate how to bring an end to bloody political violence in the country, but to help push along mediation led by former U.N. chief Kofi Annan.

He said that he and Secretary Of State Condoleezza Rice had discussed with Tanzanian President Jakaya Kikwete “how best we can help the process. Not what we should do to dictate the process but what America can do to help the process move along.”

Bush is sending Secretary of State Rice to Nairobi on Monday.

Bush, who started a five-nation tour of Africa on Saturday, has thrown his weight behind a power-sharing deal in Kenya to end a standoff over President Mwai Kibaki’s disputed re-election.

One thousand people have been killed and 300,000 left homeless in the crisis.

Annan said considerable progress was made in talks this week, including agreement for an independent review of the polls.

But, experts say an agreement on power-sharing terms is the major sticking point.

In an effort to shore up Annan’s mediation, U.S. officials said the United States was ready to sanction any individuals who sought to obstruct Kenyan peace moves.

 

Published by Korir, API africanpress@getmail.no source.kbc.ke

Posted in AA > News and News analysis | Leave a Comment »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 217 other followers

%d bloggers like this: