Education minister Sam Ongeri during the launch of the Safety Standards Manual for Schools at KIA on Tuesday. He said that caning contravenes the Children’s Act 2001. Photo/JENNIFER MUIRURI
By BENJAMIN MUINDI and SAMWEL KUMBA
In Summary
- Minister says cases of student bullying as well as excessive punishment still rampant in schools.
- The minister criticises holiday tuition saying it has been commercialised and did not serve its core purpose of strengthening learners.
- Says he is yet to receive any substantial arguments against performance contracts.
The re-introduction of corporal punishment in schools was ruled out on Tuesday by the Education minister, who said it contravened the Children’s Act 2001.
Instead, Prof Sam Ongeri said that it was the duty of school heads to ensure that no child was abused while in school.
He expressed concerns that there were still cases of student bullying as well as excessive punishment.
Many have previously linked the unrest that affected more than 300 schools this year to lack of discipline, and cited the reintroduction of caning as a solution.
Informed child
“All these conditions create abuse and must be rejected,” Prof Ongeri said while launching the Safety Standards Manual for Schools in Kenya at the Kenya Institute of Education on Tuesday
.His sentiments were shared by Mr Cleophas Tirop, the boss of the Kenya Secondary Schools Heads Association.
“Times have changed and we have to change as well. Going back to caning is going back to where we are coming from. We are dealing with an informed child and we have to change tack,” Mr Tirop said.
The minister also took issue with holiday tuition, which, he said, had been commercialised and did not serve its core purpose of strengthening learners.
But the Kenya National Union of Teachers defended teachers saying that it was wrong to accuse teachers of exploiting students through the holiday tuition.
Knut secretary-general Francis Ng’ang’a said the ban came too late, as some parents had already paid the tuition fees. He, however, said that Knut did not support the tuition because it strained children.
On performance contracts, the minister said he was yet to receive any substantial reasons from those opposed to it.
“There is nothing new, only that we are urging teachers to benchmark themselves against what they have promised to achieve in their schemes of service,” Prof Ongeri said.
Mr Tirop also confirmed that the association is not opposed to signing the performance contacts, urging the Government to table their contents for discussion.
A new war of words has emerged between Knut and the Ministry of Education over the signing of the contracts.
Mr Ng’ang’a on Tuesday took issue with the comments from the Basic Education assistant minister Prof Ayiecho Olweny, that his organisation had incited teachers not to sign the performance contracts.
He said teachers cannot be forced to blindly sign a document that they have never seen nor been inducted in.
“Bring the documents to the table and we will consider whether they have positive or negative effects on the teachers, and we will advise our members accordingly,” Mr Ng’ang’a said.
Knut incited
He rubbished Prof Olweny’s statement that Knut incited the teachers against signing the contracts, and that it was responsible for the woes in the education sector. Efforts to contact Prof Olweny were unsuccessful.
Performance contracts for teachers have been received with resistance from many quarters, with the teachers arguing that they are being ambushed by the Ministry of Education.
Earlier, Education permanent secretary Prof George Godia had said the issue of performance contracts was a closed chapter and that the Government was not ready for negotiations.
—————-
API/Source.nation.ke


