African Press International (API)

"Daily Online News Channel".

Archive for September 25th, 2008

TENSION AT MIWANI AND MUHORONI OVER CORRUPT DEALS

Posted by African Press International on September 25, 2008

<By JEFF OTIENO

There’s brewing tension and acrimony pitting the joint receiver managers of Miwani and Muhoroni Sugar factories over a broken boiler which stalled and was later repaired heftily to the tune of over 100 million.

 Kenya Sugar Board is said to have advanced the corruption plagued sugar miller a staggreing Ksh115 million to refurbish boiler number four but the “friendly company”  owned by an asian which was given the contract is said to have done a shoddy job culminating to the machine breaking down once again hardly afew days after payment is alleged to have been made.
 
Farmers and aclique of the recently elected sugar board members are said to be furios over the award of the contract to a company (SURENDRA ) whose capacity of involvement of a work of such magnitude is apparenlty in doubt.
 
“One of the sugar board members was however pessimistic when he confided to this writer that little will be achieved so long as one of the reciver managers Kipngetich Bett is still in the advisory board of Kenya Anti-Corruption Commission”.
 
“How do you investigate yourself,” one of the board members wondered in reference to the designation of Mr Bett at the KACC advisory board.
 
The financially crippled Muhoroni Sugar factory owes workers un paid dues amounting to millions of shillings dating back from July. The management is further accused of charging ksh500 on burnt sugar cane while other millers deduct nothing.
 
The farmers further appealed to the government to carry  prompt investigations regarding a six-tonne cane offloading crane which was purchased from India in circumstances said to be dubious. According to the enraged farmers the company was supposed to buy a 16-tonne crane but ended up with one of a lesser tonnage without consultations.
 
ENDS
—————-
API
About these ads

Posted in AA > News and News analysis | Leave a Comment »

Media leaders accused of sex: I know of a top director at Standard Group who divorced his wife to marry my friend almost a third his age

Posted by African Press International on September 25, 2008

A new comment on the post #6557 “Kenya Daily Nation bosses in sex scandal? ” is waiting for your approval
http://africanpress.wordpress.com/2008/06/18/kenya-daily-nation-bosses-in-a-scandal/

Author : Kamau (IP: 196.207.27.195 , 196.207.27.195.accesskenya.com)
E-mail : fotiato@gmail.com
URL    :
Whois  : http://ws.arin.net/cgi-bin/whois.pl?queryinput=196.207.27.195
Comment:
I know in Kenya anything is possible and someone can start a big fat lie and bring somebody down (especially ladies). But having once worked in a media house I cannot dismiss this story. The newsroom is one of the most immoral places to work in.

I have a female friend who told me leftie of Daily Metro offered to help her get a job at Nation if she pulled her pants down and so did Cyrus Ombati (I believe of Standard). My former college mates work in these media houses (and give me really juicy stories of the brothel cum media house in Kenya) and at first read I would believe this story.

Unless we have been paid to sabotage let us not be quick to slam this lady. The ethics in the media industry is pathetic i would never dream of working there again. I know of a top director at Standard Group who divorced his wife to marry my friend almost a third his age. And some of us here are supporting these beats. mshindwe!!

—————-

API

Posted in AA > News and News analysis | Leave a Comment »

Mekong at Risk: Report Damns Plans to Make Laos the “Battery of Southeast Asia”

Posted by African Press International on September 25, 2008


Contact:
Paul West, +1 (541) 499-5951, Skype: PaulCWest, media@internationalrivers.org
Shannon Lawrence, +216 23 456 969, Skype: shanlaw72, shannon@internationalrivers.org
Carl Middleton, +856 20 501 2836 (until Oct 2), +66 84 681 5332 (after Oct 2), carl@internationalrivers.org 


Mekong at Risk: Report Damns Plans to Make Laos the “Battery of Southeast Asia”

Recommends moratorium on damming Mekong mainstream, life-of-project payments to the poor, transparent basin-wide planning, enforcement of environmental laws and exploration of economic alternatives. 

» Click here to download full report

VIENTIANE, LAOS – An 88-page report released today by International Rivers chronicles the social and environmental debt created by river-rich Laos’ unprecedented dam-building boom. Environmental scientist Dr. Carl Middleton, International Rivers’ Mekong Program Coordinator, will present the report to government and donor representatives today in Vientiane, the Lao capital, at an official consultation on the Mekong River Commission’s Hydropower Program.

Power Surge appeals to the Lao government and donor agencies to: 

  • explore economic alternatives to hydropower;
  • designate the Mekong mainstream off-limits to dam development;
  • impose a moratorium on new hydro projects until basin-wide plans are in place;
  • enforce Laos’ environmental laws; and
  • for dams that proceed, share hydro benefits through life-of-project payments and service provision to all affected people, up and downstream. 

Laos − an opaque, one-party state − has declared it a national priority to catalyze the country’s development through the rapid construction of large dams that export high-risk hydropower to neighboring Thailand and Vietnam. With six big dams already in operation, seven currently under construction, at least 12 more in the works and development deals pending on another 35, Laos’ flood of hydro projects will monopolize the Mekong at the expense of other vital uses.

Power Surge’s 11 in-depth case studies reveal that Lao villagers are being sold down the river in hydro deals that take their fertile farmland and river fisheries, leaving them without critical sources of food and income. The people of Laos are among the poorest in the region; about 80% are farmers and fishers who have few other means to meet their basic needs and earn a living. 

“Big dams don’t develop Laos; they destroy invaluable rivers and resources upon which Lao people depend for daily survival,” says Shannon Lawrence, Lao Program Director for International Rivers and editor of the report. “Poverty reduction initiatives that support rural communities and promote government accountability need to be prioritized and scaled-up.”

According to the report, dam deals appear to be made on a first-come, first-served basis with interested companies, most of which are based in Thailand, China, Vietnam, Russia and Malaysia. The Lao Water Resources and Environment Agency lacks the authority to compel dam developers to pay for the social and environmental costs of their projects or to enforce local law. Laos’ biggest hydro project under construction, the French-led Nam Theun 2, has fallen short of promises made by the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank that it would set a new sustainability standard for Lao dams.

One of the most destructive dams highlighted in the report is the proposed Don Sahong Hydropower Project, which would be the first dam built on the lower Mekong River mainstream, one of the six that Laos is proposing. The dam would block the main channel passable year-round by fish migrating between Cambodia, Laos and Thailand. 

”Mekong mainstream dams – like Don Sahong – would be a tragic and costly mistake. For only 360 megawatts of electricity, Don Sahong would devastate fisheries that are central to people’s food security and the wider economy and undermine the region’s growing tourism potential. In a region where wild-capture fisheries are valued at US$2 billion per year and are of critical importance to riparian communities, these dams simply don’t add up,” says Dr. Middleton.

The Mekong River Commission is a river basin management organization directed by the governments of Cambodia, Laos, Thailand and Vietnam and funded by donor governments such as Australia, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Japan and Sweden. Middleton will make a presentation to the Commission challenging the dam industry’s business-as-usual approach in Laos and the wider Mekong Region. International Rivers is also sending the report and recommendations to other international institutions involved in Laos’ hydro boom including the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank.

» Click here to download full report


Supporting statements

“Big dams are risky business for the people of Laos, and for investors. If companies are going to build dams in a one-party state with no free press and little transparency, they have to take extraordinary measures to make sure that environmental and social standards are met. This is the cost of doing business in places where people’s rights are not adequately protected by the rule of law. Dam-affected people must be guaranteed compensation for their losses as well as given a direct share of project benefits.” – Shannon Lawrence, Lao Program Director, International Rivers

 “A healthy Mekong River is priceless. It is not simply the provider of economic commodities such as fish, irrigation water, and hydroelectricity. It is also the lifeblood of the region, its history and inspiration. Instead of choking the Mekong with dams, it is time that this tired old development model is replaced with one that celebrates the region’s rich cultural and ecological inheritance.” – Dr. Carl Middleton, Mekong Program Coordinator, International Rivers

“The recent mushrooming of hydroelectric projects in Laos and the wider
Mekong Region has very significant implications for the Mekong, its tributaries and – most importantly – the people whose lives and livelihoods depend on these rivers.  This report is a timely warning of the human and environmental catastrophe that lies ahead if lessons of the past are thrown to the wind.” Professor Philip Hirsch, Director, Australian Mekong Resource Centre, School of Geosciences, University of Sydney

“The environmental impacts of dams constructed on rivers around the world are well-documented. But in the case of Laos, the impacts are especially severe and present a dire scenario of water quality degradation, irreversible ecological damage and unnecessary human suffering.  At a time when global water resources are being pushed to the maximum, we see dam projects in Laos producing increased levels of greenhouse gases, an unnecessary loss of valuable fish species, toxic blooms of bacteria that poison the water, and the real threat of unnecessary human suffering from increased waterborne disease.“ – Dr. Guy Lanza, Professor of Microbiology and Director, Environmental Science Program, University of Massachusetts-Amherst

Supporting facts

2007 Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of Laos: US$4 billion
Source: World Bank, World Development Indicators database, revised 10 September 2008.

2007 population of Laos: 5.86 million
Source: World Bank, World Development Indicators database, revised 10 September 2008.

Estimated commercial value of Mekong River Basin fisheries: US$2 billion
Source: Mekong River Commission. “Annual Report of the MRC Programme for Fisheries Management and Development Cooperation,” April 2004 – March 2005.

The Mekong River provides fish, drinking water, irrigation and transport for more than 60 million people in the lower Mekong basin. Known as the “Mother of Waters,” the Mekong River supports one of the world’s most diverse fisheries, rivaled only by the Amazon and the Congo. 
Source: Mekong River Commission, “Regional Cooperation Programme for Sustainable Development of Water and Related Resources in the Mekong Basin,” October 2005; WWF, “World’s Top Rivers at Risk,” March 2007.

Fish consumption is Laos is estimated to be more than 200,000 tonnes per year or more than 40 kilograms per person per year.
Source: Van Zalinge N., P. Degen, C. Pongsri, S. Nuov, J. Jensen, V.H. Nguyen and X. Choulamany, “The Mekong River System,” p. 333-355 in R.L. Welcomme and T. Petr (eds.) Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on the Management of Large Rivers for Fisheries, Vol. 1. FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok, Thailand, 2004, as cited in WorldFish Center, “Values of Inland Fisheries in the Mekong River Basin,” 2007.

“Subsistence agriculture [in Laos], dominated by rice, accounts for about 40% of GDP and provides 80% of total employment.”
Source: CIA, The World Factbook- Laos, September 2008.

Laos has 18,000 megawatts of exploitable hydropower potential, less than 5% of which has been developed.
Source: DANIDA, “Environmental Problems of The Energy Sector,” presentation to DANIDA Natural Resources and Environment Program, Vientiane, 2001.

Electricity exports currently account for about 10% of total Lao exports. 
Source: World Bank, “Lao PDR: TA for capacity development in hydropower and mining sectors,” Project Information Document, August 2008.

Agriculture makes up the largest share of Laos’ 2006 GDP, or approximately 42%, followed by the industrial sector at 32.5% (which includes hydropower and mining), and the service sector with 25.5%.
Source: World Bank, “Lao PDR: At a Glance,” September 2007.

“Diversifying sources of growth and generating employment remain major challenges [for Laos]. Since hydropower and mining have only a limited capacity to create employment, expansion of agriculture remains the key to raising incomes and employment. … A 2007 poverty assessment noted that a major cause of poverty in the country is diminishing access to cultivated land.” 
Source: Asian Development Bank, Asian Development Outlook 2008.

Experts available for comment

Professor Philip Hirsch
Director, Australian Mekong Resource Centre
School of Geosciences, University of Sydney
Tel +61-2-9351-3355
email: philip.hirsch@usyd.edu.au
Web www.mekong.es.usyd.edu.au

Dr. Phil Hirsch directs the Australian Mekong Resource Centre and is an Internationally recognized expert on river basin management, natural resource governance, and environment and rural development in Southeast Asia.

Martin Stuart-Fox
Professor Emeritus
The University of Queensland
Tel: +617 3202 6926
email: m.stuartfox@uq.edu.au

Martin Stuart-Fox can speak on the broader political and social context of Laos. He is Emeritus Professor at the University of Queensland, Australia. He has written six books and more than fifty articles and book chapters on Lao politics and history.

Professor Guy R. Lanza
Professor of Microbiology
Director, Environmental Science Program
University of Massachusetts- Amherst
Tel: +1-413-545-4945
email: glanza@nrc.umass.edu

Dr. Guy Lanza directs the Environmental Science Program at the University of Massachusetts-Amherst. He has reviewed the Environmental Impact Assessments of several Lao hydropower projects and is an expert in the areas of water quality, ecology and waterborne disease.

Dr. Richard Cronin
Senior Associate
Henry L. Stimson Center
Washington, DC USA
email: rcronin@stimson.org

Dr. Richard Cronin heads the Southeast Asia program at the Henry L. Stimson Center and is available to address political economy issues in the Mekong region and the socioeconomic impact of hydropower development.

International Rivers
1847 Berkeley Way
Berkeley CA 94703, USA
Tel: + 1 510 848 1155
www.internationalrivers.org

—————-

 

API

Posted in AA > News and News analysis | Leave a Comment »

GEOVIC MINING APPOINTS MICHAEL GOLDBERG AS DIRECTOR

Posted by African Press International on September 25, 2008

Geovic 4C Text .jpgGEOVIC MINING APPOINTS MICHAEL GOLDBERG AS DIRECTOR

September 24, 2008 – Grand Junction, CO – Geovic Mining Corp. (“Geovic” or “The Company”, TSX: GMC, OTC.BB:GVCM), today announced the appointment of Dr. Michael Goldberg to its Board of Directors, bringing the Board size up to seven.

Currently Professor and Dean Emeritus at the Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, Dr. Goldberg’s distinguished academic career spans four decades. Additionally, he has extensive experience in the public and private sectors, having consulted to businesses and governments in Canada, the U.S., and Asia while serving on the board of directors of a dozen publicly-listed and private companies.

Dr. Goldberg has served on the MasterCard Worldwide Centers of Commerce Knowledge Panel since late 2006, chairing that board since November 2007. Additionally, he has been a director of the Canada Pension Plan (CPP) Investment Board since February 2008 and a Director of Lend Lease Global Properties SICAF, a global real estate fund subscribed to by some of the largest pension funds in North America, Europe, and Australia, since 2001.

As a result of his research and policy experience, Dr. Goldberg has advised global businesses, trade associations, and governments at all levels on housing, real estate, transportation, and urban and regional development initiatives.

Wade Nesmith, Chairman of Geovic Mining, comments “we welcome Dr. Goldberg to the Company’s Board of Directors. His wealth of international academic and business experience will serve Geovic well in meeting its long-term goals.”

Geovic Background

Geovic is a U.S.-based corporation whose principal asset is a significant cobalt-nickel-manganese deposit in the Republic of Cameroon, with initial production scheduled for late 2010. Additionally, the company controls a diverse portfolio of energy, precious metals, and uranium projects in the United States, operated through its wholly-owned subsidiary Geovic Energy.

Additional Company and project information may be found on the websites www.sedar.com and www.sec.gov. For more information, please contact:

Andrew Hoffman
VP, Investor Relations
Geovic Mining Corp.
Direct (720) 350-4130
Toll-Free(888)350-4130
ahoffman@geovic.net

or

Vanguard Shareholder Solutions
Direct(604) 608-0824
Toll-Free (866)891-9456
ir@vanguardsolutions.ca

On behalf of the Board
John E. Sherborne, CEO and Director

 

 

—————

API

Posted in AA > News and News analysis | Leave a Comment »

10 Kenyans hold the key to HIV vaccine

Posted by African Press International on September 25, 2008

Prof Walter Jaoko, left, with Prof Omu Anzala at their laboratories at the Kenya Aids Vaccine Initiative. Behind is a lab technician. Photo / ARTHUR OKWEMBA 

By ARTHUR OKWEMBA

In Summary

  • The 10 have not been attacked by opportunistic infections despite not being on antiretrovirals.
  • Those screened so far have an immune system able to elicit antibodies.

Ten Kenyans found to carry powerful antibodies that neutralise HIV, stopping it from infecting new cells, may hold the key to developing a vaccine according to researchers at the Kenya Aids Vaccine Initiative.

On being screened, the individuals were found to possess high CD4 count — immune cells used to fight infections — and very low viral loads — amount of HIV in the body —which is uncharacteristic with an infected person.

The 10 have not been attacked by opportunistic infections despite not being on antiretrovirals.

The 10 individuals are now being followed to establish who among them qualify to be what scientists refer to as Elite Controllers — individuals who are able to control HIV viral load to less than 50 copies compared to over 30,000 copies of HIV in a person without such antibodies.

“This new phenomenon is being seen in both men and women who we have screened in Nairobi, and we are keenly following them to identify the key antibodies that make them tick,” says Prof Omu Anzala, the director Kenya Aids Vaccine Initiative.

Disclosing the findings to Horizons, Prof Anzala said those screened so far have an immune system able to elicit antibodies — CD4 and CD8 — with a unique protein that target specific sites of HIV stopping it from infecting new cells.

In Africa, of the 1,700 HIV positive people who been screened in the past one year, 170 have HIV neutralising antibodies. Kenya, Uganda, Rwanda, South Africa, and Zambia, are some of those marked to help in studying this phenomenon.

“What we are experiencing now is phenomenal and provides critical information of how we move forward and the massive work we need to undertake in this direction,” says Dr Wayne Koff of International Aids Vaccine Initiative (IAVI).

In interview with Horizons, Wayne said they have managed to identify four antibodies with ability to neutralise the virus and are currently studying them to see which ones are broadly neutralising —those with ability to neutralise different types of HIV strains such as A, B, C and D.

In this quest, they are also paying particular attention to immune systems of individuals who have lived with HIV for the past three years without using ARVs. Some of them are believed to possess the neutralising antibodies.

Development

Buoyed by these new findings, IAVI is going to set aside between 30 and 50 per cent of its budget trying to develop e a new vaccine based on the new findings, according to Dr Koff.

Likewise, IAVI has developed what they call Protocol G, whose sole objective is to help scientists identify elite controllers across Africa and other parts of the world.

Identifying the broadly neutralising antibodies and then using the knowledge to develop a vaccine to produce similar responses in HIV negative individuals has been the most difficult thing for scientists. It has taken them over 10 years to just understand this phenomenon well.

Speaking recently in Nairobi to a group of scientists from Africa, Dr Koff admitted that, “as a field we have not understood as yet how to elicit broadly neutralising antibodies to tackle HIV.”

“But now,” adds an optimistic Prof Anzala, “we are on the path to somewhere and we can see light at the end of the tunnel.”

Discovery

Still, there other challenges even with the new discovery. The four neutralising antibodies identified so far work on just one site of HIV, while ideally they should do so from various points so as to be able to disable it effectively. Consequently, the search is now on to find other antibodies that work on different sites of the virus.

Discovery of these antibodies will help the scientists develop a vaccine with the ability to disable a wide range of HIV strains such as A, C, and D, which are circulating in Kenya.

As for now, the four antibodies discovered are crucial since unlike the cellular immune response that destroys a cell once infected and on which past vaccines have been developed; the neutralising antibodies are able to prevent the virus from infecting the cell in the first place.

Studies in non human primates have already shown broadly neutralising anti-bodies to possess the ability to prevent infection.

This encouraging information has led scientists to establish Neutralising Antibody Consortium, whose sole responsibility is pick-up more antibodies with ability to prevent HIV infection.

Formed in 2002, the Consortium has grown from four academic institutions to 18 now.

But as they undertake all these initiatives, scientists believe a vaccine that produces both broadly neutralising antibodies and cellular immune response would be the most effective one in controlling the virus.

An AWC Feature

————–

API/Source.nation.ke

Posted in AA > News and News analysis | Leave a Comment »

Know Your Tribe, Know Your Roots; The Abaluhya

Posted by African Press International on September 25, 2008

The Luhya (also Luyia, Luhia, Abaluhya) are the second largest ethnic group in Kenya, numbering about 5.3 million people, or 14% of Kenya’s total population of 38 million.

The Luhya cultivate the fertile highlands of Western Kenya, between Lake Victoria to the south, the Nandi Escarpment to the East, Uganda to the West and Mt. Elgon to the north. The area they live in is the most densely populated in Kenya and indeed, in the world. Luhyas are one of the most culturally, politically and economically active ethnic groups in Kenya.

Luhya refers both to the people and the Luhya languages, a group of closely related languages spoken by Luhya sub-groups. The Luhya are made up of about 16 sub-ethnic groups in Kenya, the most dominant groups being the: Bukhusu, Maragoli, Wanga, Ava-Nyore (who ruled the Bunyoro Kingdom in present day Uganda), Marama, Idakho, Khisa, Isukha, Tsotso, Tiriki, Khabras, Ava-Nyala, Tachoni, Khayo, Marachi and Samia. One sub-ethnic group is in northern Tanzania and four are in Uganda.

Note that the prefix ‘Ava’ or ‘Aba’ which when translated into English would mean ‘the people/children of …’ (for example ‘Ava-Logoli’ would mean ‘the children of Maragoli’) is placed before all the Luhya sub-ethnic groups when referring to one’s ethnicity.

Many Luhyas today are remnants of several federations (divided along the sub-ethnic lines of the Luhya), of the most powerful centralized kingdom that ever existed in Kenya’s entire history before the advent of British colonialism in the early 1900s – the Wanga kingdom. The Wanga, themselves a Luhya people, incorporated most of the other sub-ethnic groups of the Luhya, as well as much of the areas inhabited by the Luo, the Kipsigis, the Nandi and the Masai territories as far east as the popular tourist town and flower capital of Kenya, Naivasha in Central Kenya.

Origins

The Luhya oral literature of origin suggests a migration into their present-day locations from the north: virtually all sub-ethnic groups claim to have migrated first south from Misri (Egypt). In one of the Luhya dialects Maragoli, the word ‘Abaluhya’ or ‘Avaluhya’ is pronounced as A(b/v)a-roo-shia, which means “the people of the North,” “the people of the higher place,” “the people from the North,” or simply “Northerners.” Misri, what is now known as Egypt to much of the world is directly to the North of what is now called Kenya.

Luhyas travelled south along the Nile River, as they fled Egypt, before settling in the area of what is now Northern Kenya, Southern Ethiopia, Southern Sudan and Northern Uganda. Their ruler at the time was Kitanga. The Turkana later came to occupy this place and called it Lok-Kitang meaning the place of Kitang ((Lokitaung) is a modern Northern Kenyan town).

Several reasons have been posited as to why Luhyas fled Ancient Egypt (Misri): famine, droughts, and repeated attacks from foreign invaders, Egypt’s own civil wars, and disease and over taxation by Romans. We will get into each reason in detail later.

From here they moved on to what is now Central Uganda. They then claim to have migrated further east; first settling around the Mount Elgon area before displacing a forest people akin to the Khoisan of southern Africa before settling in their current homeland of what is now Western Kenya.

Other sources report that the Luhya, and some ethnic groups of Eastern, Central and Southern Africa like those of Sudan, Somalia, Chad, Ethiopia, Tanzania, Mozambique, Congo, Zimbabwe, Zambia, Malawi and South Africa, like the Zulu, Baganda, Nyarwanda of Rwanda, and the Rundi of Burundi amongst other peoples of Kenya e.g. the Kikuyu,were all native inhabitants of Misri (Egypt) before migrating southwards into the interior of Africa over the course of several hundreds or even thousands of years.

The Baganda say that their ruler at the time of their exodus from Egypt was Kintu.

Many anthropologists believe that the progenitors of the Luhya were part of the great Bantu migration out of East-Central Africa around 1000 BC. However, there are some who suggest that the Bantu speakers were part of a larger migration from Egypt (commonly known as Misri in Africa that approximately occurred between the years 500 BC and 1000 AD, after the Persian, Greek, Roman, and Arab invasions into Egypt).

Such evidence is based on linguistic, historical, scientific and cultural studies by such Egyptologists as Cheikh Anta Diop, a Senegalese, Wilberforce Obenga, a Kenyan, and Moustafa Gadalla an Egyptian, but are not mainstream or widely accepted especially among American and European historians.

In the Holy Bible God (called Nyasaye by some Luhyas) condemns Egypt for not supporting Israel in Ezekiel 29:6 – 9 says

6 Then all who live in Egypt will know that I am the LORD. ”‘You have been a staff of reed for the house of Israel. 7 When they grasped you with their hands, you splintered and you tore open their shoulders; when they leaned on you, you broke and their backs were wrenched. 8 ” ‘Therefore this is what the Sovereign LORD says: I will bring a sword against you and kill your men and their animals. 9 Egypt will become a desolate wasteland. Then they will know that I am the LORD. ” ‘Because you said, “The Nile is mine; I made it,” 10 therefore I am against you and against your streams, and I will make the land of Egypt a ruin and a desolate waste from Migdol to Aswan, as far as the border of Cush. 11 No foot of man or animal will pass through it; no one will live there for forty years. 12 I will make the land of Egypt desolate among devastated lands, and her cities will lie desolate forty years among ruined cities. And I will disperse the Egyptians among the nations and scatter them through the countries.

A few verses later, the bible adds;

19 Therefore this is what the Sovereign LORD says: I am going to give Egypt to Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon, and he will carry off its wealth. He will loot and plunder the land as pay for his army. 20 I have given him Egypt as a reward for his efforts because he and his army did it for me, declares the Sovereign LORD.

Historians like to discredit the bible as a credible source of history, even though it is. In 525 BC, Persia (Babylon) conquered Ancient Egypt. It was the first time the kingdom had been subdued, and it was the beginning of the end. Civil war followed. With internal strife comes a food shortage due to a lack of people peacefully tilling the land to produce food. Widespread food scarcity results in disease because people have no resistance to opportunistic infections. As such, this led to the exodus of native ancient Egyptians (some of whom eventually evolved into the Luhya among other African ethnic groups) from Egypt.

During the height of Rome’s power, Egypt was the breadbasket of the Roman world. Egyptian families were required to provide a portion of their harvest to the Romans. “Romans who used these foreign bases to govern the Egyptian population and to collect taxes. That led the Romans to reinforce foreign settlements, by bringing in more foreigners, mostly Jews and Syrian,” writes Moustafa Gadalla in his widely-acclaimed book ‘Exiled Egyptians.’

Over-taxation led Ancient Egyptians to vacate their land for lands further south. With no people to till the land, droughts and famines hit the kingdom. These crises, along with Barbarian invasions from Northern Europe eventually led to the demise of the Roman empire.

Such were some of the main reasons that led to the flight of the people who eventually became the different sub-ethnic groups of the Luhya from their land of origin. It must be noted that the exodus did not happen overnight, but rather, it was a gradual exit. One family here, two families there, and so on and so forth. Some African Egyptians settled in what is now Sudan, others in what is now Ethiopia, while others followed the Nile further into what is now known as Uganda, among other countries within the continent of Africa. While some descendants of Ancient Egyptians settled here, population expansion caused others to move East into what is now Kenya. Some of the ones who ended up in Kenya include the Luhya.

However, some Luhya sub-ethnic groups claim that they have always inhabited the areas around Mt. Elgon. Such varieties of histories reveal how Luhyas are probably a mixture of several Eastern African peoples combining to form a single major ethnic group which is further sub-divided into smaller sub-groups. Most Luhyas exhibit marked physical differences from one another, even within nuclear families. Some Luhyas also practiced polygamy just like their forebears in Egypt.

The Nabongo (a Wanga title for king) ancestors came from Egypt. Mutesa emigrated from Egypt with his three sons, Mwanga, Mukoya, and Kaminyi and settled in Kampala, in what is now Uganda where he died. Mutesa was the ruler of his people in Egypt and after his death; he was succeeded by his son Mwanga who adopted the title of “Kabaka”. His other son Kaminyi migrated, due to the cruelty and inhumanity of Mwanga, to Tiriki area where he became the ruler of his people with the title of Nabongo. Kaminyi had 14 wives and six children including Mwanga. Mwanga had 8 sons: Wanga I, Murono, Khabiakala, Wanga II, Muniafu, Namakwa, Mbatsa, and Wabala.

Leadership

The Luhya people call their leaders Mwami (Singular – Omwami, Plural – Bami or Abami) Luhya leadership was democratic in nature where power came from the people. The overall leader was called Nabongo with the second in hierarchy called Lukongo and followed by Likuru or Amakuru. They Luhya ruled over a large geographic area between present day Uganda, through lake Victoria Nyanza (over the present day Luo) to the present day Naivasha in the western part of Central Kenya, before being colonized by the British in 1888 after King Mumia was tricked.

For comparative purposes, this area is equivalent to almost a third of the U.S. state of Texas – (140,000 square kilometers) and is 9,000 km larger than Greece.

Luhya leaders included

Kitang’a, Maina wa Nalukale (believed to have died among the Kikuyu after being dejected by his son later known as Kintu), Mwanga, Muwanga, Shiundu, Nabongo Mumia, Hammtalla, Namutala, Namachanja and others.

European contact

The first European the Luhya had contact with was probably Henry Morton Stanley as he voyaged around Lake Victoria. In 1883 Joseph Thomson was the first European known to pass through Luhya territory on foot, and was influential in opening the region to Europeans after his meeting with King Mumia of the Wanga Kingdom. The Wanga kingdom was very similar to the Baganda kingdom and other monarchies in Uganda, an unusual form of government for Bantu speaking peoples. Mumia was the last king of the Wanga, and was recognized by the British as a chief.

Reaction to colonialism

The Bukusu strongly resisted British incursions into their territory in the 1890s. In 1895, they fought the British from a stronghold near Bungoma on the lower slopes of Mount Elgon called “Chetambe’s Fort”. But the British had machine guns and massacred over a hundred Bukusu warriors in the stronghold, who were armed only with spears and hide shields. In the 1940s and 1950s the Bukusu resisted the British under the leadership of Elijah Masinde, a religious leader and prophet who demanded return of their lands. During the Mau Mau rebellion (centered in the Kikuyu areas of Mount Kenya through most of the 1950s), Masinde was imprisoned, but was released to his home area at independence in 1963.

The Kabras and the Wanga collaborated peacefully with the British: the Kabras formed the main Luhya ethnic group in the colonial-era police forces within the Luhya homeland. Nabongo Mumia, the King of the Luhya, was forced to sign treaties with the British after being defeated; this allowed the colonial authorities to subject his people to British rule.

Significant numbers of the Luhya fought for the British in the Second World War, many as conscripts in the Kenya African Rifles. As with many African societies, the Luhya named their children after ancestors, the weather, or significant events. Consequently, many Luhya people born around the time of the Second World War were named “Keyah”, a transliteration of “KAR”, the acronym for the King’s African Rifles. Other famous Chiefs during the colonial time included, Ndombi wa Namusia, Sudi Namachanja, and Namutala.

Culture

The family

Luhya culture revolves around the extended family. Polygamy is allowed and, traditionally, was actually normal. Today, however, polygamy is only allowed in cases where the man marries under traditional African law or Muslim law. Civil marriages (conducted by government authorities) and Christian marriages preclude the possibility of polygamy. About 10 to 15 families traditionally made up a village, headed by a village headman (’Omukasa’ or Oweliguru) who was elected by the male population in the village. In many cases, the village headman was also a shaman and healer.

Within a family, hierarchy was strictly enforced. Among the men, the man of the home was the ultimate authority, followed by his first-born son. In a polygamous family, the first wife held the most prestigious position among women. The first-born son of the first wife was usually the main heir to his father, even if he happened to be younger than his half-brothers from his father’s other wives. Daughters had virtually no permanent position in Luhya families: they were viewed as other men’s future wives, and were brought up to fulfill this role. They did not inherit property, and were excluded from decision-making meetings within the family. Today, girls are allowed to inherit property, in accordance with Kenyan law.

Children are named after the clan’s ancestors, or after their grandparents, or after events or the weather. The paternal grandparents take prudence, so that the first-born son will usually be named after his paternal grandfather (kuka), while the first-born daughter will be named after her paternal grandmother (kukhu). Subsequent children may be named after maternal grandparents, after significant events, or even after the weather (for example, the name “Wafula” among the Bukusu is given to a boy born during the rainy season — this comes from the Bukusu word for rain, “efula”; and Simiyu among the Banyala was the name given to the child born during the dry season).

The clan

Luhya people usually identified with a clan: this was a grouping of people with a common ancestry (usually up to about 3 or 4 generations). The clan underpinned social interaction and determined relationships such as marriage and custom subsets. Marriage within one’s clan was taboo and was strictly forbidden. This custom persists even today: before young people get into serious relationships with members of the opposite sex, they will usually find out the clan of their would-be fiancé / fiancée. If it is established that the two, in fact, belong to the same clan, the relationship is abandoned. With the adoption of a modern, town-based lifestyle by many Luhya people, the concept of the clan is dying out among most sub-groups (with the notable exception of the Bukusu, among whom tradition is revered and is still alive).

The sub-groups

The Luhya are divided into sub-groups, each speaking a certain Luhya language or dialect. Linguistically, these subdivisions can be grouped into four main categories:

The Wanga dialect, or variations of it, is spoken by the Wanga, Marama, Kisa, Watsotso, Kabras, Isukha, Idakho, Nyore and Tachoni.

The Maragoli dialect is spoken by the Maragoli and the Tiriki.

The Bukusu dialect, or variations of it, is spoken by the Bukusu, Gisu and Masaaba.

The Nyala dialect is spoken by Abanyala of Busia and those who emigrated to Kakamenga popularly known as Abanyala ba Ndombi.

The Saamia dialect is spoken by the Saamia, Nyala (Busia), Khayo, Tura and the Marachi.

Significant overlaps exist between these sub-groups, with mini-dialects that are composed of two or more dialects. The Tachoni of Lugari area, for example, speak a dialect that is mixture of the Kabras and Tachoni dialects. The sub-groups of the Luhya are Babukusu, Abatirichi (Tiriki), Maragoli (Balogoli), Abanyole (Banyore), Abakhayo (Khayo), Abanyala (Nyala), Abasamia, Abisukha, Abidakho, Abashisa, Abamarachi, Abatsotso, Abakabarasi (Kabras), Abatachoni (Tachoni), Abawanga (Wanga), and Abamarama (Marama), Khanye, Haya.

Abanyala (descendants of Nyala)

Physically Nyala is a region somewhere between Ethiopia and Sudan.Abanyala is a Luhya sub-group which resides in two districts, Busia and Kakamega, Kenya in East Africa. It is believed that the Banyala of Kakamega originated from Busia with Mukhamba considered as their ancestral father. They are closely related with the Abanyala residing in Busia as they speak the same dialect, save for minor differences in pronunciation. The Banyala in Kakamega reside in Navakholo Division North of Kakamega forest. They are mostly known by their one time powerful colonial chief: Ndombi wa Namusia who was succeeded by his son Andrea Ndombi. Then came Paulo Udoto, Mukopi, Wanjala, Barasa Ongeti, Matayo Oyalo and Muterwa (the most recent) in that order.

Interestingly the Abanyala are a very diverse people with about thirty different clans which have intermarried forming a whole complicated network of relationships popularly called “Olwikho”. The Abanyala clans include: Abaafu, Ababenge, Abachimba, Abadavani, Abaengere, Abakangala, Abakhubichi, Abakoye, Abakwangwachi, Abalanda, Abalecha, Abalindo, Abamani, Abamisoho, Abamuchuu, Abamugi, Abamwaya, Abasaacha,Abasakwa, Abasaya, Abasenya, Abasia, Abasiloli, Basonge (also found among Kabras, Abasumba, Abasuu, Batecho (also found among Bukusu, Abaucha, Abauma, Abaumwo, Abayaya, Bayirifuma (also found among Tachoni, Abayisa, Abayundo, Abasiondo. One is not allowed to marry from his/her own clan.

Kabras

The Kabras originally Banyala, which is a Luhya sub-group, resides principally in Malava, in what is called Kabras Division of Kakamega district of western Province. The Kabras are sandwiched by the Isukha, Banyala and the Tachoni.

The name “Kabras” comes from “Avalasi” which refers to warriors or Mighty Hunters as that’s what the Kabras were. They were fierce warriors who fought with the neighbouring Nandi for cattle and were known to be fearless. This explains why generally they are few as compared to other sub-groups such as the Maragoli and Bukusu .

They claim to be descendants of Nangwiro associated with the Biblical Nimrod. The Kabras dialect sounds close to Tachoni though to the experienced ear, someone can detect some differences. Plus in all Luhya, there are different names for different things depending on the sub-dialect, so to speak.

Originally, the Kabras were few families which ended up as the head of the clans. The names of the fathers of the families also ended up as the names of the clans. The clans are Abamutama, Basonje, Abakhusia, Bamachina, Abashu, Abamutsembi, Baluu, Batobo, Bachetsi, Bamakangala and several others.

The Kabras were under Chief Nabongo Mumia of the Wanga and produced an elder in his council of elders. This was Soita Libukana Samaramarami of Lwichi village in Central Kabras, near Chegulo market.

The first church to spread to Kabras was the Friends Church (Quakers). This was through Arthur Chilson a quaker missionary, who had started the church in Kaimosi, Tiriki. He earned local name, Shikanga, and his children learned the language as they lived and interacted with the local children. Therefore Friends church still has a strong following among the Kabras though other churches have spread to the area.

Tachoni clans

[AbaChambai, Abamarakalu, Abasang'alo, Abangachi, Abasioya, Abaviya, Abatecho, Abaengele etc]. There are theories that the following clans originally belonged with the Tachoni; ] Saniak (also found among maragolis in Kenya and in Tanzania along Lake Victoria these include Former President Julius Nyereres Clan), Bangachi (also found among Bagishu of Uganda), Balugulu (also found in Uganda), Bailifuma (also found among the Abanyala)

Bukusu clans

Bakhone, Balisa, Baemba, Balunda (also found in Congo), Baengele (originally Banyala), Bakimwei, Basombi, Baechale, Babutu (descendants of Mubutu also found in Congo), Bameme, Batecho, Batilu, Babuya, Bayemba, bakhurarwa, babichachi, bakhwami

Initiation

The Luhya, with the exception of the Marama and Saamia, practiced male circumcision. A few sub-tribes practiced female clitoridectomy, but even in those, it was only limited to a few instances and was not a widespread practice as it was among the Agikuyu. Outlawing of the practice by teh government led to the end of the practice, even though a few instances still occur among teh Tachoni sub-tribe. Traditionally, circumcision was a period of training for adult responsibilities for the youth. Among the Kakamega Luhya, circumcision was carried out every four or five years, depending on the clan. This resulted into various age sets notably, Kolongolo, Kananachi, Kikwameti, Kinyikeu, Nyange, Maina, and Sawa in that order. Like the Abanyala living in Navakholo do the initiation of their young boys every other year and notably an even year. The initiates were about 8 to 13 years old, and the ceremony was followed by a period of seclusion for the initiates. On their coming out of seclusion, there would be a feast in the village, followed by a period of counselling by a group of elders. The newly-initiated youths would then build bachelor-huts for each other, where they would stay until they were old enough to become warriors. This kind of initiation is no longer practiced among the Kakamega Luhya, with the exception of the Tiriki. Nowadays, the initiates are usually circumcised in hospital, and there is no seclusion period. On healing, a party is held for the initiate — who then usually goes back to school to continue with his studies. Among the Bukusu, the Tachoni and (to a much lesser extent) the Nyala and the Kabras, the traditional methods of initiation persist. Circumcision is held every even year in August and December (the latter only among the Tachoni and the Kabras), and the initiates are typically 11 to 15 years old.

Marriage

Traditionally, the Luhya practiced arranged marriage. The parents of a boy who was of marrying age (usually about 20 years old) would approach the parents of a girl who had the desired qualities (usually, about 16 years old, a reputation for being hard-working and a fine physique — facial beauty was not very important) to ask for her hand. If the girl agreed, negotiations for dowry would begin. Typically, this would be 12 cattle and similar numbers of sheep or goats, to be paid by the groom’s parents to the bride’s family. Once the dowry was delivered, the girl was fetched by the groom’s sisters to begin her new life as a wife.

Among the Bukusu, the custom was slightly different. Young men were allowed to elope with willing (or, sometimes, unwilling) girls, with negotiations for dowry to be conducted later. In such cases, the young man would also pay a fine to the parents of the girl.

As polygamy was allowed, a middle-aged man would typically have 2 to 3 wives. When a man got very old and handed over the running of his homestead to his sons, the sons would sometimes find a young girl for the old man to marry. Such girls were normally those who could not find men to marry them, usually because they had children out of wedlock.

Wife inheritance was common: a widow would normally be inherited by her husband’s brother or cousin. In some cases, the eldest son would also inherit his father’s widows (though not his own mother).

Death

The Luhya had extensive customs surrounding death. There would be a great celebration at the home of the deceased, with mourners staying at the funeral for up to forty days. If the deceased was a wealthy or influential man, a big tree would be uprooted and the deceased would be buried there, after the burial another tree Mutoto, Mukhuyu or Mukumu would be planted (This was a sacred tree and is found along most luhya migration paths it could only be planted By a rightious Lady mostly Virgin or a Very Old Lady). Nowadays, the mourners stay for shorter periods of time (about one week) and the celebrations are held at the time of burial, with a single closing ceremony again to end the forty days. The Luhya practised African Traditional Religion and considered funerals with high regard as a custom to please the ancestors. Sacrifices were made to please the spirits. There was great fear of the “Balosi” (witches) and “Babini” (wizards). These are often referred to as the “night-runners” who prowl in the nude running from one house to another casting spells. Today, most of the Luhya practice Christianity and they refer to God as “Nyasaye”, a word borrowed from the neighbouring Luo people. The Bukusu believe in “Were” the God of Mount Elgon whom they worship. They are also said to practice African Traditional Religion and are extremely tied to their traditions.

Seers

Maina wa Nalukale, Mutonyi wa Nabukelembe (Died among the kabras in the Machina clan) Wachiye wa Namumo Elija Masinde wa Nameme

Modern culture

Luhya people that have moved to town to work are, as with most other Kenyans, unable to fully practice their culture. Many of them have turned to sports and clubs to maintain ties with their kinsmen. Most of them follow football, with the majority supporting the AFC club. The AFC Leopards football club is one of the most renowned football clubs in East and Central Africa. It was formed in 1964 under the name of Abaluhya Football club, to represent members of the Luhya community and to rival Luo Union Football club. Today, the club has a fan base spanning the entire nation, and is one of the best supported teams in the country. It has produced several stars, many of whom went on to gain national, regional and continental fame. Some of the sportsmen it produced include Wilberforce Mulamba, Joe Masiga (also a rugby player), Livingstone Madegwa, Joe Kadenge and John Shoto Lukoye. Staunch AFC Leopards fans are known to be very passionate. Matters pertaining to the club evoke high emotions among them especially against their arch rivals Gor Mahia.

Economic activities

The Luhya are, traditionally, agriculturalists, and they grow different crops depending on the region where they live. Close to Lake Victoria, the Saamia are mainly fishermen and traders, with their main agricultural activity being the raising of cassava. The Bukhusu and the Wanga are mainly cash crop farmers, raising sugar cane in Bungoma and Mumias areas respectively. The Bukhusu also farm wheat in the region around Kitale. The Isukha of Kakamega area and the Maragoli of Vihiga raise tea, while the rocky land of the Nyore is used to harvest stones and gravel for construction. In Bukura area, the Khisa are small scale and only subsisitance maize farmers. They also rear cattle, sheep, goats and chicken on a small scale. The Khabras of Malava area raise mainly maize at subsistence levels, with a few also farming sugar cane.

With the rapid modernisation of Kenya, many young Luhya people have emigrated to Nairobi and other towns in search of work, and many of them are to be found residing in the south-western Nairobi areas of Kangemi and Kawangware.

Musical Culture

The Luhya play a traditional seven-stringed lyre called litungu. The Abuluhya are famous for their intense, feastive exotic dance the Isikuti.

Cheers! Njoro

————-

API/Source.njoros blog

Posted in AA > News and News analysis | 5 Comments »

THE LUO: Know Your Tribe – Know Your Roots

Posted by African Press International on September 25, 2008

The Luo (also called Jaluo and Joluo) are an ethnic group in Kenya, eastern Uganda, and northern Tanzania. They are part of a larger group of ethno linguistically related Luo peoples who inhabit an area including southern Sudan, northern and eastern Uganda, western Kenya, and northern Tanzania.

The Luo are the third largest ethnic group in Kenya, after the Kikuyu and the Luhya. The Luo and the Kikuyu inherited the bulk of political power in the first years following Kenya’s independence in 1963. The Luo population in Kenya was estimated to be 3,185,000 in 1994 . In Tanzanian population was estimated at 280,000 in 2001.The main Luo livelihood is fishing. Outside Luoland, the Luo work in eastern Africa as tenant fishermen, small-scale farmers, and urban workers. They speak the Dholuo language, which belongs to the Western Nilotic branch of the Nilo-Saharan language family spoken by other Luo-speaking people such as the Lango, Acholi, Padhola and Alur (all of Uganda).

Luo History

Pre-Colonial Times

The Luo probably originated from Wau in southern Sudan, near the confluence of the Meride and Sue Rivers. The Kenya Luo migrated into western Kenya via today’s eastern Uganda, the first wave arriving sometime around 1500 AD. Arrivals came in at least five waves arriving at different times: (1) the Joka-Jok (who migrated from Acholiland, the first and largest migration); (2) those migrating from Alur; (3) the Owiny (who migrated from Padhola); (4) the Jok Omolo (perhaps from Pawir); and (5) The Abasuba (a heterogeneous group in southern Nyanza, with Bantu elements).

The present day Kenya Luo traditionally consist of 23 sub-tribes, each in turn composed of various clans and sub-clans: (1) Jo-Gem, (2) Jo-Ugenya, (3) Jo-Seme, (4) Jo-Kajulu, (5) Jo-Karachuonyo, (6) Jo-Nyakach, (7) Jo-Kabondo, (8) Jo-Kisumo (Jo-Kisumu), (9) Jo-Kano, (10) Jo-Asembo, (11) Jo-Uyoma, (12) and Jo-Sakwa, (13) Jo-Kanyamkago,(14) Jo-Kadem, (15) Jo-Kwabwai, (16) (17)Jo-Karungu, (18) Abasuba(Jo-Suna, Jo-Gwassi, Kaksingri, etc), (19) Jo-Kasgunga, (20)Jo-Kanyamwa,(21) Jo-Kanyada, (22)Jo-Kanyadoto, (23)Jo-Kamgundho . (Jo- indicates people of.)

By the 1840s, the Luo had a tight-knit society with ruodhi or regional chiefs.

Colonial Times

Early British contact with the Luo was indirect and sporadic. Relations intensified only when the completion of the Uganda Railway had confirmed British intentions and largely removed the need for local tribal alliances. In 1896 a punitive expedition was mounted in support of the Wanga ruler Mumia in Ugenya against the Umira Kager clan led by Gero. Over 200 were quickly killed by a Maxim gun. In 1899, C. W. Hobley led an expedition against Sakwa, Seme and Uyoma locations in which 2,500 cattle and about 10,000 sheep and goats were captured.

By 1900, the Luo chief Odera was providing 1,500 porters for a British expedition against the Nandi.

In 1915 the Colonial Government sent Odera Akang’o, the ruodhi of Gem, to Kampala, Uganda. He was impressed by the British settlement there and upon his return home he initiated a forced process of adopting western styles of schooling, dress and hygiene. This resulted in the rapid education of the Luo in the English language and English ways.

The Luo generally were not dispossessed of their land by the British, avoiding the fate that befell the pastoral tribes inhabiting the Kenyan White Highlands. Many Luo played significant roles in the struggle for Kenyan independence, but the tribe was relatively uninvolved in the Mau Mau Uprising of the 1950s. Instead, some Luo used their education to advance the cause of independence peacefully. The lawyer C.M.G. Argwings-Kodhek, for example, used his expertise to defend Mau Mau suspects in court.

Independent Kenya

Kenya became independent on 12 December 1963. Oginga Odinga, a prominent Luo leader, declined the presidency of Kenya, preferring to assume the vice presidency with Jomo Kenyatta as the head of government. Their administration represented the Kenya African National Union (KANU) party. However, differences with Jomo Kenyatta caused Oginga to defect from the party and abandon the vice presidency in 1966. His departure caused the Luo to become politically marginalized under the Kenyatta, and subsequently the Moi, administrations.

Since Oginga Odinga’s 1966 resignation from the vice presidency, the Luo people have been regarded as opponents to the government. The struggle for independence did not feature any Luo elders. As some claim however, the Luo did peacefully participate. Many remember their role in the late sixties, seventies and eighties. During the late 1980s through the 1990s, their participation provoked violent political events, for example the murder of Dr. Robert Ouko.

Culture and customs

Legio Maria

(Latin, Legion of Mary) is a new religious movement among the Luo people of western Kenya which incorporates traditional Luo religious customs into a Christian framework. It is a kind of syncretic Animist/Christian cult originally prevailing only in Luoland, but ultimately spreading widely in East Africa. It originated in the early 1960s as a breakaway of the Roman Catholic Church (RCC), declared a pope (anti-pope to conventional Catholics), and asserted that it has replaced the Church in Rome as the true Catholic Church.

The Legio Maria of African Church Mission was founded by a former catechist of the RCC among the Luo people in Kisii Diocese of western Kenya. In 1962, Blasio Simeo Malkio Ondetto  known as Baba Messiah by Legio Maria followers and as the Black Messiah or Black Jesus by others  split from the RCC taking 90,000 adherents with him.

His second in command was a woman known as Mother Maria and today revered as the true Mother of God. Both were excommunicated by the RCC in the 1960s. By 1980 the church numbered 248,000 adherents.

In the 21st century, total church membership has been estimated at over three million.
The Legio Maria headquarters and center is the village of Got Kwer, a community that the devout refer to as Jerusalem. This village of about 600 is approximately 15 km west of the south-western Kenya town of Migori. Here is Simeos old family homestead and the tomb of the Messiah himself which is viewable as a long, cloth-covered plinth with numerous devotional objects scattered around. Both are lovingly maintained by the devout.

Popes

Baba Messiah, although sometimes referred to as a pope, was technically considered a god. He has been followed by a succession of three popes to date:
Pope Timothy Blasio Ahitler (19??-1998).
Pope Maria Pius Lawrence Chiaji Adera (1998-2004)
Pope Raphael Titus Otieno (2004 date)

Traditional Religious believes

The Luo traditionally believed in an afterlife and a supreme creator, whom they called Nyasaye, and had a strong ancestor cult. Today most of the Kenya Luo are Christians.

The first major ritual in a Luo person’s life is called Juogi, the naming ceremony. Any time between birth and age two, an ancestor might appear in a dream to an adult member of the family. It is generally believed that only people who did good things when alive appear in this way and are thus reincarnated. The child is supposed to assume some of the mannerisms of the ancestor he or she is named after. If the ancestor was quiet, the child becomes a quiet person; if talkative, same. The so named ancestor becomes the individual’s guardian angel throughout life. Children are rarely named after bad people. It is believed that after death evil people are gone for good (sent to hell).

The Luo are in the minority of ethnic groups in east Africa in that they do not practice ritual circumcision of males as initiation. Instead, children formerly had their six lower front teeth carefully removed at an initiation. This ritual has largely fallen out of use.

Luo Marriage Customs

The Luo traditionally practiced polygamy, though this has fallen out of favor with young adults today, though many still practice it (it is undocumented) as it is only the first wife who is recognized by the law. (In the former times, men could marry up to five wives.)

Historically, couples were introduced to each other by matchmakers, but this is also not common now. The Luo frequently marry outside the tribe, although it is not recommended by the council of elders. The traditional marriage ceremony takes place in two parts, both involving the payment of a bride price by the groom. The first ceremony, the Ayie, involves a payment of money to the mother of the bride; the second stage involves giving cattle to her father. Often these two steps are carried out at the same time, and as many modern Luos are Christians, a church ceremony often follows.

Luo Music

Traditionally, music was the most widely practiced art in the Luo community. At any time of the day or night, some music was being made. Music was not made for its own sake. Music was functional. It was used for ceremonial, religious, political or incidental purposes. Music was performed during funerals (Tero buru) to praise the departed, to console the bereaved, keep people awake at night, express pain and agony and during cleansing and chasing away of spirits. Music was also played during ceremonies like beer parties (Dudu, ohangla dance), welcoming back the warriors from a war, during a wrestling match (Ramogi), during courtship, etc. Work songs also existed. These were performed both during communal work like building, weeding, etc. and individual work like pounding of cereals, winnowing. Music was also used for ritual purposes like chasing away of evil spirits (nyawawa), who visit the village at night, in rain making and during divinations and healing.

The Luo music was shaped by the total way of life, lifestyles, and life patterns of individuals of this community. Because of that, the music had characteristics which distinguished it from the music of other communities. This can be seen, heard and felt in their melodies, rhythms, mode of presentation and dancing styles, movements and formations.

The melodies in the Luo music were lyrical, with a lot of vocal ornamentations. These ornaments came out clearly especially when the music carried out an important message.

Their rhythms were characterized by a lot of syncopation and acrusic beginning. These songs were usually presented in solo-response style though solo performances were there too. The most common forms of solo performances were chants. These chants were recitatives with irregular rhythms and phrases which carried serious messages in them. Most of the Luo dances were introduced by these chants. For example the dudu dance.

Another unique characteristic in the Luo music is the introduction of yet another chant at the middle of a musical performance. The singing stops, the pitch of the musical instruments go down and the dance becomes less vigorous as an individual takes up the performance is self praise. This is referred to as Pakruok. There was also a unique kind of ululation, Sigalagala, that marked the climax of the musical performance. Sigalagala was mainly done by women.

The dance styles in the Luo folk music were elegant and graceful. It involved either the movement of one leg in the opposite direction with the waist in step with the syncopated beats of the music or the shaking of the shoulders vigorous usually to the tune of the nyatiti an eight stringed instrument.

Adamson (1967) commented that Luos clad in their traditional costumes and ornaments deserve their reputation as the most picturesque people in Kenya. During most of their performances the Luo wore costumes and decorated themselves not only to appear beautiful but also to enhance their movements. These costumes included sisal skirts (owalo), beads (Ombulu / tigo) worn around the neck and waist and red or white clay were used by the ladies.

The men’s costumes included kuodi or chieno a skin worn from the shoulders or from the waist respectively to cover their nakedness. Ligisa the headgear, shield and spear, reed hats, clubs among others. All these costumes and ornaments were made from locally available materials.

The Luo were also rich in musical instruments which ranged from, percussion (drums, clappers, metal rings, ongeng’o or gara, shakers), strings (e.g., nyatiti, a type of lyre; orutu, a type of fiddle), wind (tung a horn,Asili, a flute, Abu-!, a trumpet).

Currently the Luo are associated with the benga style of music. It is a lively style in which songs in Dholuo, Swahili, English are sung to a lively guitar riff. It originated in the 1950s with Luo musicians trying to adapt their traditional tribal dance rhythms to western instruments. The guitar (acoustic, later electric) replaced the nyatiti as the string instrument.
Benga has become so popular that it is played by musicians of all tribes and is no longer considered a purely Luo style. It has become Kenya’s characteristic pop sound.

Luo singer and nyatiti player Ayub Ogada received widespread exposure in 2005 when two of his songs were featured in Alberto Iglesias Academy Award-nominated score for Fernando Mereilles film adaptation of The Constant Gardener.

end

————–

Posted in AA > News and News analysis | 12 Comments »

Know Your Tribe, Know Your Roots; The Agikuyu

Posted by African Press International on September 25, 2008

Ngai nĩ ahete Agĩkũyũ bũrũri mwega ũtagaga maĩ kana irio kana gĩthaka; Wega no Agĩkũyũ magocage Ngai mũno, nĩ ũndũ anamatanahĩra mũno.”

Historical:

According to historians, the Gĩkũyũ ancestors immigrated from Meru and Tharaka via Mbeere and Ndia in the 17th Century (1601 – 1700). They regrouped in the area between the rivers North Mathioya and Gura and expanded westwards towards the Aberdares Range, southwards towards Kiambu and northwards towards Nyeri. By mid 19th century (1801 – 1900), they reached the foothills of the Aberdares. The expansion northwards was slowed by the presence of the Maasai in the area, and although trading and marriage relations were soon established between the two groups, it wasn’t until the end of the 19th century that the Gĩkũyũ occupied areas north of rivers Rũirũ and North Chania.

Finally, the southward expansion into Kiambu area occurred during the first half of the 19th century, and by 1880s Gĩkũyũ pioneers occupied the area between the Karura and Nairobi rivers, which brought them into intimate contact with Maasai living in Ngong area.

Religious:
Gĩkũyũ and Mũmbi

God (Ngai or Mũgai (The Divider)) created Gĩkũyũ the father of the Tribe and took him on top of Kĩrĩ-Nyaga (Mt. Kenya) and showed him all the land that he had given him: West from Mount Kenya to the Aberdares, on to Ngong Hills and Kilimambogo, then north to Gabatula. He then pointed to him a spot full of fig trees (Mũkũyũ) and he commanded him to descend and establish his homestead on the selected spot known as Mũkũrwe wa Gathanga (in present day Mũrang’a district). When Gĩkũyũ descended to the spot he found a beautiful wife waiting for him called Mũmbi. Together, Gĩkũyũ and Mũmbi had 10 beautiful daughters — Wanjirũ, Wambũi, Wanjikũ, Wangũi aka Waithiegeni, Wangeci aka Waithĩra, Wanjeeri aka Waceera, Nyambura aka Wakĩũrũ, Wairimũ aka Gathiigia, Wangarĩ and Wamũyũ aka Warigia, which are also very popular names for Gikũyũ females today.

When the time came for the 9’s eldest daughters to marry, the youngest Wamũyũ not yet being of age, Gĩkũyũ prayed to God under a holy fig tree, (Mũkũyũ), as was his tradition, to send him sons-in-law. He offered a lamb as sacrifice and as the fire was consuming the lamb’s body, nine men appeared and walked out of the flames. Gĩkũyũ took them home and each daughter married the man who was the same height as she was, and together they gave rise to the nine of the ten clans to which all Gĩkũyũs belong. Wamũyũ got a child out of wedlock.

These clans are the Anjirũ, Agacikũ, Ambũi, Angũi aka Aithiegeni, Angechi aka Aithĩrandũ, Aacera, Ambura aka Aakĩũrũ aka Eethaga, Airimũ aka Agathiigia, Angarĩ aka Aithekahuno and Aicakamũyũ.

Note: Some authors only count nine daughters and nine clans leaving out the youngest daughter Wamũyũ aka Warigia and her lineage, the Aicakamũyũ. The Gĩkũyũ of old believed that it brought bad luck to count ones children. It was believed that a person who did so was tired of Gods blessings. As such the 10 clans are referred to by the Agĩkũyũ as full-nine (kenda-mũiyũru).

The legends say that the tribe was initially matrilineal but the women became tyrannical rulers and the men overthrew them by impregnating them at the same time. In those days the women were much stronger than the men.

Religion:

The Gĩkũyũ religion is monotheistic. There is one God known as Ngai who is the provider and the divider of the universe (Mũgai). He is the creator of the father and mother of the Agĩkũyũ, known as Gĩkũyũ and Mũmbi. Ngai is invisible. He was also referred to as Mwene-Nyaga (possessor of brightness), which is associated with Kĩrĩ-Nyaga (Gĩkũyũ name for Mt. Kenya), which means that which possesses brightness or mountain of brightness.

Mount Kenya (Kĩrĩ-Nyaga) is the resting place of God, whenever he comes to inspect the deeds of men. The sacred fig trees (mũkũyũ and mũgumũ) are the sacred centre where the people perform their rites. It is also believed in some quarters that the name Gĩkũyũ, the father of the Agĩkũyũ, was derived from the Mũkũyũ. The Mũkũyũ was also the preferred tree of worship, but the Mũgumũ is much more common. Ngai promised Gĩkũyũ that whenever he had need he should sacrifice facing Mt. Kenya (Kĩrĩ-Nyaga) and he would come to his aid and thus we pray facing Mt. Kenya. A Gĩkũyũ saying goes that Ngai ndagiagwo, meaning God does not concern himself with small matters. As such Ngai was approached in the old days in cases of national calamities and disasters like famine and praying for rain. He was also approached at the birth of an individual, at initiation, at marriage and at death. He was not worshipped by individuals but was only approached by at least a family group with the father as the head or by elders of the tribe under the sacred fig trees, mũkũyũ and mũgumũ. A homesteads centre of worship was the wives hut called nyũmba.

Ngai while not visible to mortal eyes manifests himself in many ways. Through the sun, the moon, the stars, thunder, lightning, the rainbow and rain.

Gĩkũyũ religion had no priesthood and was closely interwoven with traditional customs of the people. At birth one automatically acquired the religion, which was taught by the parents. The Elders led the prayers and sacrifices to Mwene-Nyaga. Apart from them, the Gĩkũyũ had seers called Arathi to whom God communicated messages in their sleep to impart to the tribe. Such a person was Cege wa Kĩibirũ or Mũgo wa Kĩibirũ who predicted the coming of the Europeans.

Most if not all early European writings about the tribe revolve about whether the savage, at a much lower evolutionary stage according to them, could conceive the concept of a deity. Worship was done in form of prayer and sacrifice.

Religious rituals were partly determined by natural rhythms, as with rites performed at seed time and harvest, and partly by recurrent needs. Gĩkũyũ society was highly conscious of the divine and spiritual hierarchy. Thus if a man fell sick, first ordinary treatment was tried, including traditional herbal medicine. Then it may have become necessary to consult the ancestors, who even if they were not displeased, the sick person may not have recovered, in which case the elder of the family may have instituted a sacrifice to Ngai, supported by the invisible family members, the ancestors.

Ngai was worshiped in communion with the ancestors. The Gĩkũyũ believe that dead relatives live on in the spirit world and continue to be part of the family and are treated as such. In fact they visited their homesteads from time to time to hold communion with the living.

Land played a very central role in the Agĩkũyũ life as the indefinable link between the living, the dead and the unborn. Land is also considered the mother of the tribe. In offering sacrifices the ancestors are also present. It was customary to pour a little of whatever one was drinking to the ground for the ancestors to also partake, a custom strangely similar to the one of pouring a little liquor to a dead friend or relative as exemplified by black American rap stars and singers in several videos. The ancestral spirits can be either benevolent or malevolent and so might require appeasement from time to time.

Social organization:

The family was the smallest economic, political and religious unit of the tribe. A family consisted of a man who was the head of his household, his wife or wives and their children. A family group would then include the grandchildren and the great grandchildren. This unit is referred to as Mbarĩ.

Several Mbarĩ join to form the clan (Mũhĩrĩga). The clan is believed to have descended from the same family group in the remote past. All clans unite to form the Agĩkũyũ nation. The 2nd factor unifying the Agikuyu is the age-grading system (riika). This system united the tribe in all of its activities; where as different clans act independently. In the past the riika was determined by circumcision of the boys and girls. A riika had very strong links of brotherhood and sisterhood that lasted throughout the lives of the individuals.

Social interaction was highly governed by the system of ‘give and take’. For example in building a hut, a family would call upon on the assistance of their friends and this would naturally abide knowing that they too would also need some collective assistance at some point. A lot of things were done communally.

The most significant in the life of an individual, male or female were initiation and marriage.

Initiation:

Was done for both male and females and it gave the individual the status of a full responsible member of the tribe. Initiation involved the circumcision of both male and females. In male the fore skin was removed and in female clitoridectomy was performed. The operation described by Kenyatta involved an excision of the clitoris described as a minor operation which was over in a matter of minutes. The female circumcision controversy of 1929 involving the Mission Church of Scotland and the Agĩkũyũ seems to have been as a result of some parts of the community practising, what is referred to as a major operation involving the removal of the clitoris plus labia minora and majora.

The initiation was a communal event and an elaborate process, involving a preparation period, the surgical operation and a healing period. Everything was accompanied by song and dance and initiates gained their first sexual experiences in an act known as ngwĩko which involved fondling without actual penetration, which was prevented by a girl’s lower garment. As can be imagined, the bond created among initiates both male and female was indestructible.

Special names were given to each initiation set, mostly drawn from events or phenomenon appearing at the time of the ceremony. Most of the names that have been covered were given to males. So Gatego was the name of the group initiated when syphilis first appeared in Gĩkũyũ country, Wainaina (kuinaina means to shake) describes those who shivered during the circumcision. Incidentally some of these set names are common names given to males. It would be interesting to see where the connection lies. On top of that the names are great markers of time in Gĩkũyũ history as the initiation took place at regular intervals.

Initiation opened a number of doors. Only an initiated man or woman could marry. It also began a mans journey as a political, religious and judicial member of the tribe. Details involving women are very sketchy at best. It is only now that works regarding the tribe are being done by Gĩkũyũ women.

Much information that could have been gained has been taken to the grave by the female ancestors, owing to the fact that no Gĩkũyũ women were there to record their thoughts and general outlook in life. Early accounts when a lot of knowledge was there for the taking, before pollution by Christianity which took hold relatively fast among the Gikuyu, were written by men and no matter how good , nothing can compare the information narrated directly by a female member of the tribe.

Sadly these practices are no more, and although certainly not advocating for female circumcision, the process surrounding the ceremony is certainly a great loss to the tribe. The male circumcision has also been reduced to the surgical operation in a clinic without the surrounding pomp, ceremony, music and dance.

Marriage:

Marriage was another thing that opened doors especially for the man. A man could not normally join the council of elders unless he was married. The achievement of certain eldership status was tied to a mans children having gone through initiation. Marriage was not just the joining of a man and a woman in holy matrimony but also the joining of two family units (mbarĩ) and probably two clans (mĩhĩrĩga). Its still unclear whether it was possible to marry within a clan as by Gĩkũyũ legends members of the same clan would be descended from the same person and as such were relatives if a bit distant. The whole process of marriage was also very elaborate and the ceremonies must have been fantastic. Marriage itself was an expensive affair for a family, with the rũracio (loosely translated bride price) consisting of up to forty sheep and sometimes heads of cattle. As such, even though the society was polygamous, it is doubtful that the average mwananchi had more than 2 wives.

It’s important to note that the marrying of many wives was not just a desire of a man. His own wife or wives would agitate him to take up more wives. On top of being a symbol of prosperity and who does not want to be seen as prosperous even if it involves sharing a man, this was probably as a result of Gĩkũyũ division of labour among the sexes in which the women did an unusual amount of carrying, the most taxing probably being water and firewood. Water is particularly hard to carry owing to the Gĩkũyũ landscape where the people’s homesteads are at the top of a ridge and the rivers at the bottom. Going up a hill carrying a pot of water is no picnic. The other tasks the woman had to perform are not taxing but annoying in that they must be done every day and on top of that two times a day like cooking. Planting which was done by both sexes, although according to early European accounts the women must have been doing an inordinate amount of this.

The White man in all his wisdom solves these problems by either inventing some machine to do unwanted tasks or ironically enslaving folks, so that they can do things for him that he doesn’t really want to do like they did in colonialism and slavery in the USA.

Political Organization:

The political organisation was closely interwoven with the family and the riika (initiation set). A young man after initiation through circumcision automatically entered into the national council of junior warriors (njama ya anake a mumo). After 82 moons or 12 rain seasons after the circumcision ceremony the junior warrior was promoted to the council of senior warriors (njama ya ita). Together these two councils would be called upon to protect the tribe in case of external aggression. The council of senior warriors was in addition an important decision making organ. The two councils were served by men of 20 – 40 years.

Upon marriage a man was initiated into a council called kiama kĩa kamatimo. This was the first grade eldership and it denoted elders who were also warriors. At this stage the man played the role of observers of senior elders. They are required to assist in proceedings by carrying out menial tasks like skinning animals, being messengers, carrying ceremonial articles or light fires among other tasks.

When a man had a son or a daughter old enough to be circumcised, he was elevated into another council called the council of peace (kiama kĩa mataathi). On entering this council the man was now a man of peace and no longer of the warrior class. He assumed the duty of peace maker in the community.

When a man had had practically all his children circumcised, and his wife (or wives) had passed child-bearing age he reached the last and most honoured status. A council known as kiama kĩa maturanguru (religious and sacrificial council). After paying an ewe which was slaughtered and offered in sacrifice to Ngai (God) the man was invested with powers to lead a sacrificial ceremony at the sacred tree (Mũgumũ mũtĩ wa Igongona). The elders of this grade assumed the role of ‘holy men’. They were high priests. All religious and ethical ceremonies were in their hands. In the Agĩkũyũ society the religious, governance and law functions were closely intertwined with various councils being called upon to perform one of these functions.

It is not quite clear whether women also had councils and what functions these councils served. The initiation ceremony seems to have been organized by a council comprised of both men and women.

Parallel to the said councils the family unit formed a council known as ndundu ya mũcie of which the father was the head. The father as the head of the household then represented the family in the next council called kiama kĩa itora (village council) comprising of all the family heads in the village. This was headed by the senior elder. A wider council called kiama kĩa rũgongo (district council) was formed comprising of all the elders from the district. This was presided over by a committee (kiama kĩa ndundu), composed of all the senior elders in the district. Among the senior elders, the most advanced in age was elected as the head and judge (mũthamaki or mũciiri) of the ndundu. The district councils then came together to form the national council. Among the judges, one was elected to head the meetings.

Land Tenure System:

The Agĩkũyũ had a very complex land tenure system. Due to the way the community was organized on the social and economic level, most of the land was held by family units, mbarĩ. However individual land ownership was also possible. This came about in the very old days by acquiring hunting and cultivation rights to a piece of land. This was done by pegging a piece of forest and clearing it. As time went on and the amount of forests diminished, land had to be purchased from the neighbouring community of the Ndorobo. Ndorobo were mainly hunters and bee keepers and traded with the Agĩkũyũ, by supplying honey and skins in exchange for grains.

Land thus purchased by an individual was owned by the individual as long as he was not married. On marriage, the land became joint property between him and his wife. The man would clear part of his land for the wife to cultivate. She thus acquired cultivations rights to the piece designated. The overall ownership was retained by the husband. The wife referred to this piece of land as”my garden” (mũgũnda wakwa), while she referred to the rest of the land as “our land” (githaaka giito). If the husband took a second wife, the same was repeated. Another part of the land would be cleared by the husband for the second wife to cultivate. The wives would refer to the land as “our land”, while the husband would refer it as “my land”.

No one, except perhaps the husband would encroach on the wives cultivated lands. If a wife needed more land to cultivate, this would be cleared for her. If each of the wives had 2 sons who married 2 wives each, the number of people with cultivation rights would increase to 9. Daughters didn’t inherit land on their fathers’ side but played a role where they were married. Daughters would however also use the land before marriage.

With time as the size of the family increased, land would no longer support all the people. The more prosperous members of the family would move out and purchase land elsewhere. Those with no money would become ahoi or athami, meaning they acquired cultivation and building rights on land belonging to another family unit (mbarĩ). When the first purchaser died, the land would belong to all the sons of the man, who would all retain their cultivation and building rights on the land. The eldest son would play the role of titular or trustee (mũramati).

The mũramati duties were to see that the land was used properly. In case people outside the family group (mbarĩ) wanted to gain cultivating or building rights, he would grant them after consultations with the family. Only in the case where a man had one son would the son inherit the land outright. A man could only sell or give away his land outright when he had full ownership as purchaser or as one who first acquired hunting rights by clearing the land and if he had only one son. If he had many sons, he was no longer alone and would have had to consult them before selling the land. Only if he was a very bad man would he sell the land without consultations, in which case the elders who acted as witnesses to all land transactions would implore on him to think of the welfare of his family.

A mũthami was one given cultivation and building rights on a piece of land belonging to a man or a family group. His history and character would be checked before being accorded such rights. The land was given on condition that the person would respect the rights of the land owning family and keep peace with them. Further, the mũthami was required to give a calabash or gourd of beer to the mũramati or his representative or the owner whenever he had the occasion to brew beer. He was further obliged to help in case of work of emergency such as building houses or cattle pens. In case of a breach of contract in the case of the mũthami, his rights were terminated and were required to vacate the land. The authority to evacuate was vested on the muramati. If he, the mũthami, refused to do so, the matter would be referred to the council of elders who naturally ruled in favour of the mũramati. There was no rent paid by the mũramati. He was of course given sufficient notice to vacate the land and harvest his crop.

A mũhai was one given only cultivation rights and no building rights. He was only obligated to give beer, when he’d brewed sugar cane beer from the land given to him. Like the mũthami, no rent was charged.

A mũramati if he mismanaged the land for instance and a quarrel arose between him and his juniors, the village council (kiama kĩa Itora) would be called and they would divide, if all reconciliation efforts failed, the land between all the male representatives of the family group. The old mũramati was thus now only responsible for his immediate family and could sell the land and move away and buy the land someplace else if he wished. His kin had the first option in such a case. The other family members could elect another mũramati and carry on as before.

In addition to farm land there was land which was free for anyone in a given district to use. This included, pasture where cattle grazed in common. Salt licks (moonyo), mineral springs (irori), in addition to public spaces called ihaaro reserved for meetings and dances. Public roads and paths (njera cia agendi), as well as sacred groves where national sacrifice was offered to Ngai were also used collectively.

When a land sale had taken place, a ceremony was conducted to mark out the boundaries. Only when the agreed sheep and goats had exchanged hands could such a ceremony take place. This was performed by the principle elders of the district. After the ceremony which included the slaughtering of a ram, trees and lilies were planted to mark the new boundary.

The Economy:

The chief occupation of the Agĩkũyũ was farming and rearing of livestock. A family which included a man his wife or wives and their children formed an economic unit. Labour was divided from the homestead to the fields. In house building the work of cutting timber and putting up the framework is done by men, while women cut and carry the grass used for thatching the house. They also plaster the walls with clay or cow dung. Men build fences around the homestead or gardens and cattle pens. They are night watchmen to protect crops against wild animals. Women carry out the entire housework including cooking, cleaning and fetching fire wood and water.

In the field men clear the bush and cut the big trees and break the virgin soil with digging sticks or hoes. Women come behind them and prepare the ground for sowing of seeds. Planting is shared by both sexes. Men plant bananas, yams, sweet potato vines, sugar canes, tobacco, and also provide poles for propping up bananas and yams. Women plant maize, various kinds of beans, millet and sweet potato vines. Weeding is done collectively. Cutting drains or water furrows and pruning banana plants as well as making roads and bridges are the work of men. Harvesting is done primarily by women. Tending of cattle, sheep and goats, as well as slaughtering, distributing meat and preparing skin is entirely men’s duty. Dress-making, pottery and weaving baskets is exclusively women’s profession. Wood-carving, bee-keeping and hunting are men’s occupations. Women take responsibility for grinding corn and millet, for making gruel, and pounding grains in wooden mortars. They also pound sugar-cane for making beer. The brewing of beer is done by women and men. Trading is done by both sexes. Women carry chiefly grains to the market, while men bring sheep, goats or cattle. Faming was mainly done through crop rotation.

Children begin their activities in production very early. When young they are left at home to mind small babies, or are taken to the fields and allowed to play in one corner of cultivated field. As soon as they can handle a digging stick, they are given small allotments to practice on. Parents help in planting seeds and help them distinguish crops from wild plants or weeds. As the child grows a larger field is allocated according to that child’s abilities. Work is done collectively and crops cultivated in the care of the mother who is the managing director of food supply in the homestead. A girl continues to cultivate the plot till marriage, where in case her new homestead is near she continues to cultivate it and take the food to her homestead. If she goes far the fields are left to the mother. The boy takes full control of his fields when he marries.

The wife is in charge of the homes food supply. After the harvest she stores enough grain to feed the family till the next harvest. Excess crops are taken to the markets where it is traded through barter. A wife who manages the economic affairs very well is not only highly regarded in her home but also by the entire community.

Cattle are a sign of wealth, as few people can afford them. Cattle play an economic role especially their hide used for bedding, making sandals and straps for tying firewood and carrying other loads. Cattle are never killed for food save in famine. Bulls and oxen are slaughtered for feasts. Cattle play a part in marriage ceremony, where a cow is given as marriage insurance (rũracio). Sheep and goats were used as currency. The price of almost anything was determined in terms of sheep and goats. Sheep and goats were used for various religious sacrifices and purifications. They are the main supply of meat and skins and are used as articles of clothing. They are also given as marriage insurance (rũracio).

On top of internal trade the Agĩkũyũ also traded with neighbouring tribes, the Maasai and the Akamba. With the Maasai, trade involved spears, swords, tobacco, gourds and red ochre. There are inter-tribal markets where goods are exchanged but sometimes a group of men would organize into a trading guild and take their goods into the heart of Maasai country. This kind of trade would be conducted in the homestead of a friend who acted as the guide and protector of his friends and their goods. As for the Kamba, there are no special items, as both tribes are agriculturalists, unlike the Maasai who are herders. Soft chains, snuff-boxes or carriers, bows and arrows, and herbal medicines were among the articles exchanged in trading or given as presents to friends.

Industry:

Ironworking:

The chief iron articles of pure Gĩkũyũ origin are spears, swords, digging-and clearing knives of different sizes, ear and finger rings, arrow heads, bracelets, axes, fine chains, hammers, tongs and tweezers among many others.

Iron is obtained from washing sand secured from certain districts and in a particular river. The sand is carefully washed in a river by experienced men; the black substances that contain ore are put together and handed over to the women and the children, who help to spread the ore in the sun to dry. The one great demand for iron was during the time of initiation when the new warriors needed spears and swords. New ore didn’t have to be collected for every need.

Recycling was also practiced where old worn out iron items were collected to build new ones.
The dried sand containing iron is put by the smithy in a special fire made from a particular tree and others from a special banana plant. After a ritual the process of smelting is commenced with. Two bellows are employed simultaneously to keep the fire burning. They are worked by assistants who learn the profession by watching the smith doing his work. The bellows are put in motion, the charcoals are carefully laid and the sand is carefully sprinkled over the burning fire. The heat is regulated by adding the required amount of charcoals in the furnace. At the same time, the blowing of the bellows is kept in check. Sometimes the heat is intensified, other times it is slowed down. The ore is reduced to metallic iron, technically known as blooms (gekama).

The smith and his assistants work from morning to evening. In the evening the melted iron is left in the furnace to cool. In the morning the blooms which have collected together into small lumps are taken out of the furnace. These are joined into a big heap by a mass of slag which has overflowed during the melting. After the big pile of slag is taken out the blooms are knocked and collected together. Next, the blooms are heated according to the quantity required to make a spear or a sword or other iron articles. The iron thus beaten as heaps is known as mondwa. If a man wants a spear he will not buy a ready made one, but will buy mondwa and pay the smithy to make him one.

Hut Building:

Gĩkũyũ huts are round with wooden walls and grass thatched roofs. The woman’s hut is called nyũmba and is considered the traditional sacred abode of the family and the proper place to hold communion with the ancestors. All aspects of religious and magical ceremonies and sacrifices which concern the family are centred around the nyũmba. The man’s hut is called thingira where friends and casual visitors are entertained. A hut is built and occupied on the same day. This is achieved by the Gĩkũyũ collective method of working.

To make a good circle, a kind of string compass is employed. A string is put in the centre of the circle and a string tied to it., then a man holds one end of the string and after measuring the required paces, he holds the string tight and then goes round, marking the ground until the circle lines meet. This is called gokurura kiea. When this is done the builders start digging holes in the ground for the outer walls. The holes are about one foot deep and about six inches in diameter. After this the inner circle is marked, which the wall is erected and roof put on. This completes the mens work in building. They build the frame. The women complete the work by thatching and thus the hut is completed.

Pottery:

Pottery was done by women. Certain clans specialized in this work The digging of the clay, beating and softening it, the moulding and drying, burning of the pots and finally the marketing was all done by women. The industry is carried out with two purposes, to satisfy the family needs and for marketing. The latter is the most important factor in deciding whether pots are to be manufactured or not, for unless the potters are satisfied that there is a good market for their articles, they will not undertake the task. Very few potters have good pots for themselves; they sell the good ones to others.

Basket Making:

This is again done by women although a man is not restricted from handling the material while the baskets are being made unlike in pottery. A man may collect the materials and prepare them ready for his female relatives or friends to use. He may however not do the actual work. The baskets are made of strings called mũgio, mũkeo, mwondwe and mũgotha. The barks are chewed or beaten to soften and strengthen them; they are then stretched and put in the sun to dry. The next process is to wind them together into a long string about fifteen feet long. Several of this are mad into balls, similar to those which European women use for knitting. When enough strings are prepared the work of knotting kĩondo, is undertaken. The baskets are of different shapes and sizes according to fashion and taste. Basket-knitting is looked upon as a spare time job. It is generally done in conversations or travelling, or going to and from work.

Apart from baskets, there are two kinds of trays called gĩtaroro (large tray) and gĩtiti (small tray), which are sewn from a creeper called moogo. This is cut from several pieces which are then sewn together. Gĩtaroro is used for winnowing and spreading grain in the sun to dry. Gĩtiti is used as a dish for serving or keeping food cooked and uncooked. This two articles are made chiefly by men although there is no taboo preventing a woman from making them.

Skin Tanning:

All Gĩkũyũ men and women dressed in skins, which made this industry very important. For this purpose also, sheep, goats and cattle would be kept. In every family group (mbarĩ), there would be one or two members specialising in tanning of skins and cutting them into shape for making dresses. There is a marked difference between the skin suitable for a man’s dress and one for a woman’s. Not only do they differ in quality but in the method used in tanning them.

A skin for a woman’s dress has to be made thin and soft for it is said that a woman’s body is made of soft and delicate texture.

The skin made for a woman’s dress is first pegged on the ground to dry. Then, hair is peeled off by a specialist. When the process is complete, the skin is softened by rubbing it in the hands. After this the skin is ready to be measured and cut into the right size. A woman’s skirt takes about 2 skins and an upper garment needs three or four skins. This maybe sheeps or goats. Goat’s skin has more value and longer wear. A woman’s clothes consist of three garments. An upper garment called nguo ya ngoro, a skirt called mũthuru and an apron called Mwengu. Unlike women clothes, a man has only one garment, gĩthii made of kids’ skins or very small calf. Gĩthii for young men are made short covering the body from the shoulders to just below the heaps. The only other garment is the apron, gĩthere worn only for ceremonial dances. The elders wear a long gĩthii. Chiefs and rich men wear a more elaborate gĩthii made of fur, whilst the lower ranks wear gĩthii made of sheep skins.

Special Professions

The Medicine Man, Mũndũ Mũgo:

Throughout the Gĩkũyũ nation, medicine men were employed in curing diseases and also curing people inflicted by evil spirits. They also provided several magical charms covering all fields from love to protection during war. In fact before the warriors went to war a medicine man would be consulted, a practice which found some revival during the mau mau war for independence.

Medicine men had great knowledge in the use of herbal leaves for medicine, thus great knowledge in medicinal plants. The medicine man, of course had a very special place at the heart of Gĩkũyũ nation. They elicited a lot of resistance from the missionaries being called satanic. There exist herbal medicine practitioners in the Kenya of today. It would be interesting to find out, what link, if any, they have to the medicine man of old. The medicine man in the old days was not just an expert in herbs but had to communicate with the spirits to see if a persons afflictions came from that other world, and if so what would have to be done to appease the spirits, so that the person could regain his good health. Certainly the use of magical charms is not part of the Gĩkũyũ nation that I grew up in, although being an urban child; I might not be at the position to quite know. Magical charms are nowadays associated more with our neighbours the Kamba

The Seer, Mũrathi:

In the Gĩkũyũ nation there existed great seers, the most famous one probably being a man by the name of C(h)ege son of Kĩbirũ or Cege wa Kĩbirũ, later called Mũgo wa Kĩbirũ, who prophesized the coming of the white man to the Gĩkũyũ nation, saying there would come people who’d have bodies like kiengere, a small light coloured frog which lives in water and whose dress would resemble ciĩuhuruta (butterflies). They’d carry magical sticks which would produce fire. Further he prophesized the coming of the railway line that would stretch from one water body in the east to another in the west and the train which he described as an iron snake that would spit fire. Further this snake would ‘eat’ people and ‘vomit’ them out. He also predicted the coming of the famine that would signal the coming of the strangers with bodies like kiengere.

Some of today’s scholars may cast doubt on these prophecies on account that Mũgo wa Kĩbirũ must have known some of the things from Gĩkũyũ who might have travelled to the coast for trade purposes, and certainly it would have been easy to know about guns and clothing from the Arabs and whites at the coast but the railway line (built 1896 – 1901) and the train are a different proposition. The steam engine train was a relatively new invention which started being operational in 1825. Further the Africans would have had to be on extremely friendly terms with the Arabs and whites for them to gain that information, if at all the Arabs knew about it. Secondly while Leakey says that trade contacts existed between Arabs and the Kikuyu for a while, it is possible that these contacts existed only in certain parts of the Gĩkũyũ nation and not everywhere.

Boyes in his accounts testifies that he was the first white man that the Gĩkũyũ he came to rule had ever seen and that he was an object of a lot of curiosity. He even further goes on to use a trick to show his white powers, by shooting a hole through a soft barked tree. Lastly if items like guns and Arabs were common knowledge in Gĩkũyũ land, then the prophecy wouldn’t have been met with such astonishment. Details about when Mugo wa Kibiru lived, when he died or even where exactly he lived are extremely sketchy.

Another seer was Kongo wa Magana who was the grandfather of the first president of the Kenyan nation, Jomo Kenyatta aka Kamau wa Ngengi, who is also the author of one of the most comprehensive accounts of the Gikuyu to date (Facing Mount Kenya).

Witchdoctors, Arogi :

These were some of the most hated people in Agĩkũyũ country. They used their magic and poisons for evil. They practised their craft in great secrecy as being found out as a witchdoctor meant certain death by being burnt. The fire set by ones own relative, no less. This, in a society, where one could get away with murder under certain circumstances.

The Blacksmith, Mũturi:

Obviously the Gĩkũyũ society was heavily dependant on iron tools in times of war and peace. As such the smiths’ family held a special place in Agĩkũyũ society. The smiths curses were also much feared and people did well not to incur them. The trade was passed on from father to son. It was a skill practised only by men, even though the entire family was involved especially in the procurement of iron ore from the river beds. This, like most other things are skills that went under in the post colonial period. Although described as primitive by Routledge, who thought he was standing at the dawn of the prehistoric man, they incorporated very modern themes like recycling. Generally anything lost no matter how irrelevant to today’s world is a big loss.

Music, Song And Dance:

The Gĩkũyũ were and still are a musical folk. Music and dance played an important role in traditional life and during the mau mau (Kenya Land Defence Army) freedom war. The dancing seemed to have captured the imagination of early white anthropologists and missionaries. The missionaries deemed some of the dancing as being too provocative, and condemned them along with many things associated with tribal life as demonic. This is especially true with the dances held after initiation. Sadly most of these dances disappeared alongside with many things Gigĩkũyũ during and after colonialism. Initiation is no longer a shared experience that bonds a given group of the same age for life but a private affair for young men in a clinic somewhere. How useful a video camera would have been in those days! Gĩkũyũ of nowadays is transported through normal mode of recorded sound and video.

Gĩkũyũ musical Instruments:

The Agĩkũyũ had very few musical instruments, most songs being done vocally. Kenyatta, in facing Mt. Kenya identifies only four kinds of musical instruments in the whole of the Gĩkũyũ country. These are:

1. Drum (Kĩihembe (or ndarama today)) was restricted in use to very few ceremonial songs and dances. It is used to supply rhythms to particular swinging dances and songs called njong’wa. The only other occasion when the drums are used is in a procession of young men and young women when they are in a parade, kĩonano, which takes place at the opening of seasonal day of dances and songs called gĩichukia kĩa mũthenya or kĩbata.

2. Large rattle (Kĩgamba): This was worn chiefly by men, women only wearing during initiation ceremonies. It’s main purpose was to provide rhythm to dances. It was made of an oval metal sheet folded and resembling a banana fruit and was filled with bullets, ng’arang’ari, which produced musical sound according to the movements of the person wearing them. It was fastened below the knee, with a strap which extended above the joint. It was worn only during special occasions, such as war dances and initiation ceremonies.

3. Small rattle (Njigiri) are made of the same material as the large ones and are of similar shape, the only difference being in size. The Njigiri is between one and two and a half inches. It’s chief use was as an ornament and to provide walking rhythm. It was worn on the lower part of the ankle. Some people preferred only one of this rattles but some others wore more than a dozen threaded together on leather straps. This rattles were also used in training children in the proper use of the right hand. The rattles were tied to the childs right hand and by tinkling the rattles a child’s hand was strengthened.

4. Flute (Mũtũriro) made of bark or shrub and is of temporary nature. A certain shrub called mũkeo or mũgio, is cut according to the size of the flute required. Several holes are cut for producing several notes. Some people prefer four holes, others six or eight. Materials also vary from bamboo or the shrubs named above, which means a new flute every day.

The Gĩkũyũ flute was never used to lead a dance, only for leisure, or as comfort when a man was in grief or feeling lonesome. The flute was also played when a man was guarding the millet crop from the birds. A high platform called gĩtara is built in the middle of the field, where a man scares away the birds with a sling. The art of playing the flute was not practiced by women but they are keen listeners and it was also played by the men folk for them. In fact the flute was mostly played by boys and young men.

Mass Communication:

Important communications in the Gĩkũyũ nation were relayed by means of ceremonial horns (coro). Unlike other African tribes the Gĩkũyũ did not employ drums in transmitting information. If drum messages were received from neighbouring tribes, they were relayed further in Gĩkũyũ country by sounding particular horns. The horn was used to announce the beginning of the planting season, during initiation ceremonies and when sacrifices were offered, to announce the day that an execution were to take place and at the end of the execution.

Spatial Organization:

The Gĩkũyũ country is spectacular by any account. It was then as it is now. This especially in the areas very close to the snow capped Mt. Kenya like Nyeri and Murang’a districts. The country consists of a series of huge valleys and ridges criss-crossed by various streams and rivers. This is however torturous, especially to the women who had to fetch water from rivers which were at the bottom of the ridge and then bring the water up. The advent of rain harvesting tanks made life much easier for the women.

The Agĩkũyũ due to their nature of worship had no need for ceremonial huge buildings which formed the main and spectacular architecture in pre-industrial European societies. God was worshipped under a sacred fig tree, a mũgumo or better a mũkũyũ (some even believe that it is this tree that gave the tribe it’s name) in the nature.

Ngai was at home in the big mountains and his people didn’t need a special house to worship and sacrifice, Ngai having provided them with spectacular nature.

As such the only significant architecture was in the home, which was composed of a series of round huts, built in a circle. This would house a man, his wife or wives and their kids. Further there might have been cattle pens for keeping cows, if a family was thus endowed. Apart from this there were also granaries ikũmbe where grain was stored.

There were a series of open spaces for collective or communal use. This included pasture lands where cattle from different families would graze. The other open space known as kĩhaaro was used for community gatherings such as social events like after initiation and also legal venues where cases would be presented and judged by the council of elders. Naturally connecting various homesteads were paths or roads known as njĩra cia agenda. It is not clear where markets were situated or whether the kĩhaaro doubled up as a market space.

The Concept Of Time:

The Agĩkũyũ had four seasons and two harvests in one year. These were divided as follows
1. Mbura ya njahĩ [The Season of Big Rain] from March to July, Wangarĩ Maathai, the Kenyan environmentalist and Nobel Price Winner was born in this season.
2. Magetha ma njahĩ [The season of the big harvest] between July and Early October
3. Mbura ya Mwere [Short rain season] from October to January
4. Magetha ma Mwere [the season of harvesting millet]

Further, time was recorded through the initiation. Each initiation group was given special name. According to Professor Godfrey Mũriũki, The individual initiation sets are then grouped into a regiment every nine calendar years. Before a regiment or army set, there was a period in which no initiation of boys took place. This period lasted a total of four and a half calendar years [nine seasons in Gĩkũyũ land, each season referred to as imera] and is referred to as mũhingo, initiation taking place at the start of the fifth year and going on annually for the next nine calendar years. This was the system adopted in Metumi [Mũrang’a]. The regiment or army sets also get special names, some of which seem to have ended up as popular male names. In Gaki [Nyeri] the system was inversed with initiation taking place annually for four calendar years, which would be followed by a period of nine calendar years in which no initiation of boys took place [mũhingo]. Girls on the other hand were initiated every year. Several regiments then make up a ruling generation.

Professor Mũriũki approximates a ruling generation to last an average of 35 years. The names of the initiation and regiment sets vary within Gĩkũyũ land. The ruling generations are however uniform and provide very important chronological data. On top of that, the initiation sets were a way of documenting events within the Gĩkũyũ nation, so, for example, were the occurrence of small pox and syphilis recorded. Girls’ initiation sets were also accorded special names, although there has been little research in this area. Mũriũki only unearths three sets, whose names are, Rũharo [1894], Kibiri/ Ndũrĩrĩ [1895], Kagica [1896], Ndutu/ Nuthi [1897].

All these names are taken from Metumi [Mũrang’a] and Kabete [Kĩambu]. It is strange that professor Mũriũki didn’t do more research in this area because he states that the girls’ initiation took place annually.

According to Hobley each initiation generation, riika, extended over two years. The ruling generation at the arrival of the Europeans was called Maina. It is said that Maina handed over to Mwangi in 1898. Hobley asserts that the following sets were grouped under Maina – Kĩnũthia, Karanja, Njũgũna, Kĩnyanjui, Gathuru and Ng’ang’a. Professor Mũriũki however puts these sets much earlier, namely Karanja and Kĩnũthia belong to the Ciira ruling generation which ruled from the year 1722 to 1756, give or take 25 years according to Mũriũki. Njũgũna, Kĩnyanjui, Ng’ang’a belong to the Mathathi ruling generation that ruled from 1757 to 1791 give or take 20 years according to Mũriũki.

The ruling generations [riika] according to Mũriũki, which he used to trace the history of the Agĩkũyũ to the year 1500 or there abouts.

1. Manjiri 1512 – 46 ± 55
2. Mamba 1547 – 81 ± 50
3. Tene 1582 – 1616 ± 45
4. Agu 1617 – 51 ± 40
5. Manduti 1652 – 86 ± 40
6. Cuma 1687 – 1721 ± 30
7. Ciira 1722 – 56 ± 25
8. Mathathi 1757 – 1791 ± 20
9. Ndemi 1792 – 1826 ± 15
10. Iregi 1827 – 1861 ± 10
11. Maina 1862 – 97 ± 5
12. Mwangi 1898?

Mathew Njoroge Kabetũs list reads,
Tene, Kĩyĩ, Aagu, Ciĩra, Mathathi, Ndemi, Iregi, Maina [Ngotho], Mwangi

Gakaara wa Wanjaũs list reads
Tene, Nemathĩ, Kariraũ, Aagu, Tiru, Cuma, Ciira, Ndemi, Mathathi, Iregi, Maina, Mwangi, Irũngũ, Mwangi wa Mandũti. The last two generations came after 1900.

One of the earliest recorded lists by Mc Gregor reads (list taken from a history of unchanged)
Manjiri, Mandoti, Chiera, Masai, Mathathi, Ndemi, Iregi, Maina, Mwangi, Muirungu
Professors Mũriũkis list must be given precedence in this area as he conducted extensive research in this area starting 1969, and had the benefit of all earlier literature on the subject as well as doing extensive field work in the areas of Gaki [Nyeri], Metumi [Mũrang’a] and Kabete [Kĩambu]. On top of the ruling generations, he also gives names of the regiments or army sets from 1659 [within a margin of error] and the names of annual initiation sets beginning 1864. The list from Metumi [Mũrang’a] is most complete and differentiated.

Mũriũkis is also the most systematically defined list, so far. Suffice to say that most of the most popular male names in Gĩkũyũ land were names of riikas [initiation sets].

Here is Mũriũkis list of the names of regiment sets in Metumi [Mũrang’a].
These include Kiariĩ [1665 - 1673], Cege [1678 - 1678], Kamau [1704 - 1712], Kĩmani [1717 - 1725], Karanja [1730 - 1738], Kĩnũthia [1743 - 1751], Njũgũna [1756 - 1764], Kĩnyanjui [1769 - 1777] , Ng’ang’a [1781 - 1789], Njoroge [1794 - 1802], Wainaina [1807 - 1815], Kang’ethe [1820 - 1828] Mbugua [1859 – 1867], Njenga or Mbira Itimu [872 – 80], Mutung’u or Mburu [1885 – 1893]

H.E. Lambert who dealt with the riikas extensively has the following list of regiment sets from Gichũgũ and Ndia. It should be remembered that this names were unlike ruling generations not uniform in Gĩkũyũ land. It should also be noted that Ndia and Gachũgũ followed a system where initiation took place every annually for four years and then a period of nine calendar years followed where no initiation of boys took place. This period was referred to as mũhingo.

Karanja [1759 - 1762], Kĩnũthia [1772 - 1775], Ndũrĩrĩ [1785 - 1788], Mũgacho [1798 - 1801] , Njoroge [1811 - 1814], Kang’ethe [1824 - 1827], Gitaũ [ 1837 - 1840], Manyaki [1850 - 1853], Kiambuthi [1863 - 1866], Watuke [1876 - 1879], Ngũgĩ [1889 - 1892], Wakanene [1902 - 1905]

The remarkable thing in this list in comparison to the Metumi one is how some of the same names are used, if a bit off set. Ndia and Gachũgũ are extremely far from Metumi. Gaki on he other hand, as far as my geographical understanding of Gĩkũyũ land is concerned should be much closer to Metumi, yet virtually no names of regiment sets are shared. It should however be noted that Gaki had a strong connection to the Maasai living nearby.

The ruling generation names of Maina and Mwangi are also very popular male Gĩkũyũ names. The theory is also that Waciira is also derived from ciira [case], which is also a very popular name among male Agĩkũyũ. This would call into question, when it was exactly that children started being named after the parents of one parents. Had that system, of naming ones kids after ones parents been there from the beginning, there would be very few male names in circulation. This is however not the case, as there are very many Gĩkũyũ male names. My theory is though that the female names are much less, with the names of the full-nine daughters of Mũmbi being most prevalent.

Gakaara wa Wanjaũ supports this view when he writes in his book, Mĩhĩrĩga ya Aagĩkũyũ page 29.

“Hingo ĩyo ciana cia arũme ciatuagwo marĩĩtwa ma mariika ta Watene, Cuma, Iregi kana Ciira. Nao airĩĩtu magatuuo marĩĩtwa ma mĩhĩrĩga tauria hagwetetwo nah au kabere, o nginya hingo iria maundu maatabariirwo thuuthaini ati ciana ituagwo aciari a mwanake na a muirĩĩtu.”

Freely translated it means
“In those days the male children were given the names of the riika [initiation set] like Watene, Cuma, Iregi or Ciira. Girls were on the other hand named after the clans that were named earlier until such a time as it was decided to name the children after the parents of the man and the woman.”

From this statement it is not clear whether the girls were named ad-hoc after any clan, no matter what clan the parents belonged to. Naming them after the specific clan that the parents belonged to would have severely restricted naming options.

This would strangely mean that the female names are the oldest in Gĩkũyũ land, further confirming its matrilineal descent. As far as male names are concerned, there is of course the chicken and the egg question, of when a name specifically appeared but some names are tied to events that happened during the initiation. For example Wainaina refers to those who shivered during circumcision. Kũinaina [to shake or to shiver].

There was a very important ceremony known as Ituĩka in which the old guard would hand over the reigns of government to the next generation. This was to avoid dictatorship. Kenyatta relates of how once in the land of the Agĩkũyũ, there ruled a despotic King called Gĩkũyũ, grandson of the elder daughter [Wanjirũ according to Leakey] of the original Gĩkũyũ of Gĩkũyũ and Mũmbi fame. After he was deposed of, it was decided that the government should be democratic, which is how the Ituĩka came to be. This legend of course calls into question when it was exactly that the matrilineal rule set in. The last Ituĩka ceremony where the riika of Maina handed over power to the Mwangi generation, took place in 1898-9 [Hobley]. The next one was supposed to be held in 1925 – 1928 [Kenyatta] but was thwarted by the colonial imperialist government. And one by one Gĩkũyũ institutions crumbled.

The Law:

Every household head, the man of the house acted as the first instance in disputes arising around his homestead. If there was a big dispute, then he called on heads of the family within his family unit, mbarĩ. If this failed then it was time to move to the highest court of the land.

The highest court of the land consisted of the elders of three stages, junior elders called kiama kĩa kamatimo, who were mainly there as trainees of law and had such functions as to fetch firewood and water and light fires. They could not yet judge a case. The next council of elders kiama kĩa mataathi were the main judges. Other than that there was a council of elders called kiama kĩa maturanguru who were the eldest and most experienced and were called upon to assist in intricate parts of the law. A man entered this council when practically all his children were circumcised and his wife or wives were past child bearing age.

Cases brought before the council of elders were heard in the meeting space also known as kĩhaaro. The elders heard from both parties. In making a case the concerned parties would use twigs given to the elders after each concrete complaint was made. After the arguments were made, an open session followed in which elders expressed their opinions for or against either party. At the end of this a special committee, ndundu, was formed that would deliver judgement. This retired to a place where no one could here their deliberations and only came out when a decision was reached. An appeal was possible if one of the parties didn’t agree with the ruling.

Oaths played a significant part in the judicial process. Fear of breaking the oath and the misfortunes that would befall one prevented people from giving false testimonies, as well as brought defenders to justice by means of a guilty conscience and confession. Curses acted as good deterrents against crime. Most cases heard by the kiama involved debts resulting from transactions of sheep, goats or cattle, exchanged in buying land or paying marriage insurances (rũracio). There were also a few criminal cases involving murder, trespass, assault, theft and witchcraft. The last two were the worst crimes. Theft for first time offenders was not serious but perpetual offenders would face death just like proven witchdoctors.

Fees to the council was a ram. Beer would also have to be brewed and offered when a case was being opened. Interestingly for murder cases the compensation for a mans life and a womans life varied greatly. The loss of a mans life was fixed at one hundred sheep or goats or ten cows. That of a womans life was fixed at thirty sheep or goats or three cows.

Cheers! Njoro

————–

API/Source.njoros blog

Posted in AA > News and News analysis | 6 Comments »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 217 other followers

%d bloggers like this: