African Press International (API)

"Daily Online News Channel".

Archive for May 1st, 2009

Kalonzo is the loser in Speaker’s landmark ruling coalition government President Kibaki – Marende saved the nation from further power struggle

Posted by African Press International on May 1, 2009

 kalonzo-and-raila-power-struggle

Vice President Kalonzo musyoka has a word with Prime Minister Raila Odinga at a past function. PHOTO/ FILE  

By GITAU WARIGI and EMEKA-GEKARA MAYAKA

In Summary

  • By being denied the House Leader post, the Vice-President’s political image was injured and the President’s authority weakened, and as PNU argues, ODM now occupies critical positions of power in Parliament.

 

The media’s overall opinion of Speaker Kenneth Marende’s Tuesday ruling on the Leader of Government Business was that it left ODM and PNU in a draw.

That assumption was peddled because the Speaker opted not to rule on who between Vice-President Kalonzo Musyoka and Prime Minister Raila Odinga should take the position. Instead, Mr Marende threw the ball back to the two principals.
The political reality, however, is that the VP was the loser, and by extension, the President himself.

Mr Kibaki had written to the Speaker about his decision to appoint the VP the House Leader, a position he actually reinforced with another letter after the Speaker publicly declared that he would seek meetings with the two principals to help break the stalemate.

Hesitate to defy

Up to then, the PNU side appeared confident that Mr Marende would hesitate to defy what was in essence a legally-clothed presidential edict, which no previous Speaker had ever done. That was the reason President Kibaki’s minders felt confident to advise him against arranging an appointment with the Speaker.

There is some thinking in lower PNU circles that perhaps the tactics should have been different. An adviser to the VP had suggested that the meeting requested by the Speaker would have been helpful, even as they expected the President would use it to restate the position he had taken.

Some backbenchers did not fail to notice that as Mr Marende read his lengthy ruling he included a paragraph admonishing the Head of State to accord “respect” to the Speaker’s office.

Ndaragua MP Jeremiah Kioni, Mr Mohammed Affey of ODM-Kenya and Limuru’s Peter Mwathi argue that by the Speaker ruling that he will chair the committee on an interim basis, he had handed control of Parliament to Mr Odinga’s ODM.

Deputy Speaker Farah Maalim will chair the committee in Mr Marende’s absence while ODM chief whip Jakowo Midiwo and his PNU counterpart George Thuo will be the first and deputy leaders, respectively.

All from ODM

Given that Mr Marende, Mr Farah and Mr Midiwo are all from ODM, it is easier to argue that the party occupies critical positions of influence in Parliament to push its agenda.

This is seen as a well-calculated onslaught by ODM to weaken their coalition partners, President Kibaki’s PNU.

Assistant minister Mwangi Kiunjuri reckons that this is part a long-term plan aimed at disabling PNU and exercising power using Parliament as platform. “They want to take over executive power. Mr Odinga is acting as if he is the President. These days he even parks at the space reserved for President Kibaki in Parliament.”

Besides President Kibaki, the other loser in this battle for power can only be Mr Kalonzo who has been chairing the committee and leading government business in Parliament. By being denied the post, the VP’s stature in Parliament is injured in the face of his rivals in the 2012 presidential contest.

And given the emphasis that the chair must be agreed upon by President Kibaki and Mr Odinga, it is highly unlikely that the two will settle on Mr Musyoka, who has a frosty relationship with the ODM wing of the grand coalition. This could mark a significant decline of his political fortunes.

ODM leaders are particularly furious with any attempts by the VP to appear to be occupying a higher position in the political hierarchy than Mr Odinga.

This put an extra burden on the son of Tseikuru who has been fighting the tag of traitor, an intruder and third party in the grand coalition government even as he positions himself for the 2012 contest.

This week, the womenfolk asked him “to step aside and refuse being used to undermine the good intentions of the National Accord.”

They said that “the introduction of the Vice-President into the marriage of the principals is intended to undermine the marriage, bring duress and the ultimate collapse of the marriage.”

But another group led by ODM-Kenya nominated MP Shakila Abdallah opposed the view saying Mr Musyoka joined the government well before ODM.

Vulnerable President

Mr Musyoka hurriedly entered a coalition with a vulnerable President Kibaki as ODM claimed that the Head of State had stolen the 2007 General Election.

But there is the argument that his manner of appointment had “cheapened” the institution of the vice-presidency. His presence in the coalition has been a source of discomfort to ODM, which feels that he betrayed their dream of taking over the presidency.

In fact, some of ODM-Kenya MPs are inclined to the view that the ruling is part of a plot by ODM “to cut Mr Musyoka to size and put him in his political place.”

This would explain his fury over the new arrangement. Mr Musyoka’s threat – which he has since reconsidered – to seek court interpretation over what he called “an assault on the presidency” betrayed his anger.

But Kenyatta University lecturer Dr Tom Namwamba says any attempt to contest the Speaker’s ruling in court would be “naïve”. He added, “That is tantamount to challenging the power of the Speaker as the head of Parliament.”

But Mr Kioni thinks that by rejecting the President’s nominee, Mr Marende had usurped the powers of the Executive.

Dr Namwamba faults the logic. He argues that by the National Accord empowering Mr Odinga to share power, it is erroneous for “anybody to argue that the PM does not exercise executive power.”

A politician familiar with the Vice-President’s thinking said the VP is likely to make a public statement asking the President to nominate any other leader to chair the committee “if the ODM tide becomes too strong”.

Mr Kalonzo’s declaration will likely be made in the fashion of his last and clearly populist pronouncement that he will accept a pay cut “to resolve the dispute over the Prime Minister’ salary.”

But from the VP’s corner, there is a palpable feeling of despair and demoralisation. The VP’s people believe that the PM has decided to go full blast against the VP so as to destroy his 2012 chances.

This is not entirely a unanimous view within PNU. Though there is no doubt that the VP was a target, there are other big forces in PNU whose battle standard is that the real target is President Kibaki.

This is the one time when a Kenyan president has been reduced to the weakest point. Mr Kibaki has effectively lost control of Parliament. He has neither the majority in the House nor in the House Business Committee. And as things stand after Mr Marende’s ruling, both the job of Leader of Government Business and the chairmanship of the HBC are no longer a guarantee for PNU.

Furthermore, ODM’s House majority places it at a vantage point to take control of all House committees. Likewise, its HBC majority (11 to 10) automatically would win it the committee’s chairmanship were the matter to be put to the vote.

As per latest indicators, however, there is a possibility that a compromise will be worked out whereby the VP remains Leader of Government Business while the PM becomes chairman of the HBC.

source.nation.ke

About these ads

Posted in AA > News and News analysis | Leave a Comment »

Mass poverty in Africa and South Asia is man’s goldmine – who are the beneficiaries?

Posted by African Press International on May 1, 2009

In Summary

British politicians alarmed by State fund manager’s £1 million package

 

LONDON, Thursday

Politicians today described as “extraordinary” the near 1 million pound salary earned by the head of a government-owned fund manager tasked with reducing poverty in developing countries.

The government department responsible for the fund had shown “ineffective” oversight in how pay levels were set, said the Commons Public Accounts Committee.

Large returns

Richard Laing, chief executive of CDC Group, earned 970,000 pounds in 2007 after his performance-related pay was boosted by unexpectedly large returns in the fund’s investments.

Between 2004 and mid-2008, CDC’s assets more than doubled to 2.7 billion pounds, far exceeding expectations.

“The remuneration arrangements led to extraordinary levels of pay in a small publicly owned organisation charged with fighting poverty,” the committee said in a report.

“Part of that pay reflects market-beating financial results, but it also reflects a dubious comparison with private sector ‘fund of funds’ businesses,” it added.

It said pay arrangements placed too much emphasis on financial performance and too little on poverty reduction.

CDC, formerly the Commonwealth Development Corporation, is wholly owned by the Department for International Development (DFID).

Private sources

It does not donate aid, but invests in companies in developing countries to create jobs and stimulate further investment from other private sources.

Since a restructuring in 2004, it makes its investments indirectly through private fund managers.

Mr Laing told the committee he could defend his salary as results had been “very good” and that CDC had generated 1.7 billion pounds over four years.

“We need to attract good people to do what we do and that is why people are paid well,” he said.

Last November, DFID Secretary Douglas Alexander said CDC would move away from investing in more profitable urban projects and increase its investments in the poorest countries in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. (Reuters)

source.ke

Posted in AA > News and News analysis | Leave a Comment »

Probe Raila’s family over maize, say MPs – Who stole the maize?

Posted by African Press International on May 1, 2009

By OLIVER MATHENGE and CAROLINE WAFULA
The role of Prime Minister Raila Odinga’s family in the maize scandal that rocked the country earlier this year should be investigated, a parliamentary committee has recommended. The committee also called for the sacking of two permanent secretaries over the scandal that led to the loss of Sh800 million.

The Departmental Committee on Agriculture, Lands and Natural Resources says the National Cereals and Produce Board (NCPB) managing director should also be fired for mishandling the sale of maize from the stores.

“Investigations should be carried into actions of the Permanent Secretary, ministry of Agriculture, Permanent Secretary, ministry of Special Programmes, Managing Director, National Cereals and Produce Board and all officers in volved in maize importation to establish whether there was professional negligence,” says the report. It also wants the Kenya Anti-corruption Commission to investigate the Cabinet ad hoc sub-committee on food security on alleged irregularities in maize imports.

On Mr Odinga’s family, the MPs say that “based on the evidence adduced before the committee, on maize importation, the committee recommends that the role of personal assistant to Prime Minister, the Prime Minister’s family, the son and associates in all this import saga and particularly, possible link to maize importers, be investigated further to establish whether indeed the companies were registered in Kenya or foreign as alleged”.

Price increase

The report that was tabled in Parliament yesterday by the committee chairman, Mr John Mututho (Naivasha) is a culmination of investigations into the acute maize shortage that hit the country early this year. The report points to an erroneous projection of maize stocks as the source of the maize shortage and the consequent famine.

The committee investigated the alleged maize shortage, causes of price increase for food and possible or proposed recommendations on the causes and future mitigation measures. However, reached for comment, Prime Minister Raila Odinga described the call for investigation on the role of his family in the scandal as “a bunch of nonsense”.

Speaking through his spokesman, Mr Dennis Onyango, the PM said: “It is a bunch of nonsense and House committees need to be led by men and women of integrity if their reports are to be taken seriously.” NCPB boss Gideon Misoi said he would comment after reading the report. “Once I have read it, I will be more than willing to comment on the findings.”

Efforts to reach Special Programmes PS Mohammed Ali and his Agriculture counterpart, Dr Romano Kiome, were futile because their telephones went unanswered. The two did not reply to inquiries made through phone messages. While tabling the report, Mr Mututho said that, the sacking of Dr Kiome, Mr Ali and Prof Misoi would pave way for investigations and allow criminal or civil proceedings to be instituted against them.

The MP said the committee had done its work and it was up to Parliament to adopt or reject the report. “We have done our work on behalf of Kenyans and we leave the rest to Parliament,” he said while tabling the findings in the House. He said the committee had perused “between 5,000-6,000” documents to support claims in the massive report.

Parliament will debate the report after it is allocated time by the House Business Committee, which sets the agenda of the House. If adopted by MPs, the government will be obliged to implement the recommendations. Mr Mututho said that his team had been wrongly accused of protecting Agriculture minister William Ruto with regard to the maize scandal.

“I wish to correct the wrong impression created that we are covering up for the minister. We are not protecting anyone and this is not about politics,” he said. His team, he said, established that a Cabinet committee had usurped the minister’s powers of organising purchase of 1.7 million bags of maize.

Mr Mututho’s committee heaps blame on the scandal on the Cabinet ad hoc committee on food security. The team of 11 MPs accuses the committee chaired by the Prime Minister of being responsible for the maize shortage and playing a part in the maize scandal, claiming that it had deliberately over-priced purchase of 1.7 million bags imported to meet the maize deficit.

The ad hoc committee was in charge of the importation of maize, and according to Mr Mututho’s team, it did have influence on the companies that tendered for the maize imports. According to the parliamentary team, the Cabinet committee altered the tender specifications to allow the highest bidder to win the tenders.

The report says the team had received evidence that at the tendering period, one of the bidders was able and was willing to supply non-genetically modified maize at $150 (Sh12,000) for a tonne but did not qualify. Instead, the report says, the Cabinet committee settled for a bidder quoting $430 a tonne, almost three times more than what the lowest bidder had offered.

This, says the parliamentary committee, resulted in the country buying only 1.7 million bags when settling for the lowest bidder would have enabled it to purchase up to 5 million bags.

source.nation.ke

Posted in AA > News and News analysis | Leave a Comment »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 189 other followers

%d bloggers like this: