African Press International (API)

"Daily Online News Channel".

Archive for June 4th, 2009

Top politicians named in Parliament as pyramid fraudsters – They sould loose their positions and be punished

Posted by African Press International on June 4, 2009

If it is true that top politicians and others wealthy in the society are engaged in fooling the people to invest in schemes that later make them loose their savings, such fraudsters should be punished.
The government should pay those who have lost money and then go after the fraudsters to get the money. If the fraudsters are unable to pay, they should go to jail and whatever they have be sold and handed in as government revenue. (API)
By ALPHONCE SHIUNDU

In Summary

  • An estimated Sh34 billion was lost in the fraudulent deals.
  • Minister says the fraud was the cause of about 20 suicides across the country and had led to the separation of many families.

 

A number of Kenya political elite are among the masterminds of a syndicate that saw Kenyans lose money running into billions of shillings.

A former Cabinet Minister, an ex-MP and a previous advisor to the president have been named in Parliament as being behind the infamous pyramid schemes, where a huge amount, estimated at Sh34 billion, was lost.

Mr Njeru Ndwiga, former minister in charge of Cooperative Development was top on the list of nine names mentioned in the House.
Former presidential aide Stanley Murage and the newly appointed chair of the Interim Independent Boundaries Review Commission Mr Andrew Ligale were also named in the MPs’ list of shame for masterminding the fraud.

The wife of Trade minister Amos Kimunya was also mentioned as an MP sought to know the role played by the government in “protecting” the pyramid schemes through which Kenyans lost money.

Others are Mr Gideon Mwiti, Ms Mary Odinga (former ambassador), Mr George Donde, a Dr Ndamwe and a Mr Zacharia were also named by Ikolomani MP Bonni Khalwale.

However, as Dr Khalwale and Igembe South MP Mithika Linturi revealed the names before the House, the government urged restraint saying it needed two weeks to bring a complete list of fraud masterminds.

Co-operative Development Minister Joseph Nyaga told the House that he could not confirm whether those named by the MPs executed the fraud.

The minister said the fraud was the cause of about 20 suicides across the country and had led to the separation of many families.

He said there were 169 companies engaged in the fraudulent schemes fleecing Kenyans, 16 which quickly converted into savings and credit societies after the Central Bank put a stop to the schemes.

A task force led by former Cabinet minister Francis Nyenze heard of how investors throughout the country were left penniless or in huge debt after the Central Bank cracked the whip on the fraudsters.

Nonetheless, the minister said the names must have come out during the public hearings and picked up by the media.

“Just give me two weeks and I will bring a report, since we still have to clarify these issues (of those named by the MPs),” he said.

The Nyenze team, formed last February, has toured the country, collecting views and registering victims who lost money in the schemes.
Mr Nyaga also told the House that the taskforce had interviewed directors and managers of the collapsed schemes to ascertain the truth in claims made against many of them.

source.nation.ke

About these ads

Posted in AA > News and News analysis | Leave a Comment »

The sentencing of the white man killing people in Kenya: Cholmondeley’s sentence too lenient, says State

Posted by African Press International on June 4, 2009

API has an opinion about this white man who shoots Kenyans, killing them like one hunts for animals and he is not punished by locking him in jail for life or being handed death sentence by hanging, just like it would have have happened if the man doing what this man does was a black man

Now the prosecutor has decided to appeal the 8 month sentence, a sentence that made the man’s family very happy and got them into celebratory mood. The family thinks the man will already be home for christmas if he has good behaviour in prison. Are these people thinking of the women whose husbands were murdered by this man who has no remorse? He should at least get 12 years if not life or death sentence. (API)

By Evelyn Kwamboka

The State now wants the eight months jail sentence slapped on Thomas Gilbert Cholmondeley enhanced.

Director of Public Prosecutions Keriako Tobiko said the sentence is lenient and amounts to gross miscarriage of justice.

In a certificate filed in Court of Appeal yesterday, the DPP pointed out that Justice Muga Apondi failed to take into account all the relevant factors in imposing the sentence.

He also said the judge took into account extraneous or irrelevant factors in jailing Lord Delamere’s kin.

Tobiko filed the certificate as Cholmondeley’s advocates were busy preparing a memorandum of appeal against a High Court ruling that he killed stonemason Robert Njoya.

Cholmondeley had filed a notice to appeal against the manslaughter verdict.

Justice Apondi passed the verdict after he found no evidence supporting a murder charge initially filed against him and sentenced him to eight months in jail.

Equal treatment

Lord Delamere’s heir was convicted after the court found that he unintentionally killed Njoya.

The judge said he had not taken into account Cholmondeley’s offer to pay compensation to the dead man’s family, race, wealth or status in deciding the sentence.

“There should not be one law for the rich and another for the poor,” the judge said.

But he noted the accused had rendered first aid to Njoya after the shooting and used his car to take him to hospital. In deciding what he described as a ‘light sentence’, Apondi noted the 1,097 days Cholmondeley had already served behind bars. “I do believe deeply that the process has humbled the accused person. This court has taken into consideration that the accused has been held in custody for slightly over three years since he was arrested.”

The judge said the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt since the circumstantial evidence adduced “irresistibly led to the guilt of the accused”.

 

source.standard.ke

Posted in AA > News and News analysis | Leave a Comment »

Obama reaches out to Muslims – Will they get his point and go for dialogue with the US for a new beginning?

Posted by African Press International on June 4, 2009

It is a great opportunity that has now come from the Americans and should be received by the Muslim world with open arms. The Israelis must now understand that they are dealing with Hussein Obama, a man who understands Islam and whose Kenyan family are Muslims. The Israeli PM must see the point in all this and start demolishing the houses he has built for his people in the occupied territories and hand over the territories to the rightful owner - the Palestinians.

There is no other way to achieve peace between the Palestinians and the Israelis! Israel must accept the Palestinians to have their own State and the Palestinians must accept the existence of Israel as Obama has said. Giving peace a chance in this way will give opportunity to all people living in the area.

The problem that has to be given priority is what to do with Jerusalem issue. (API)

Obama in Cairo

US President Barack Obama speaks in the Grand Hall of Cairo University in Cairo June 4, 2009. Obama told Muslims on Thursday that violent extremists have exploited tensions between Muslims and the West. Photo/ REUTERS 

By REUTERS

In Summary

  • Obama offered no new proposals to advance the Middle East peace process.
  • Before the speech, the US president met Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak.

 

President Barack Obama sought a “new beginning” between the United States and the Muslim world on Thursday but offered no new initiative to end the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, an omission likely to disappoint many.

“We meet at a time of tension between the United States and Muslims around the world — tension rooted in historical forces that go beyond any current policy debate,” the US president said in a major speech at Cairo University.

“I have come here to seek a new beginning between the United States and Muslims around the world, one based upon mutual interest and mutual respect,” he said. “America and Islam are not exclusive, and need not be in competition.”

Obama’s speech was an effort to restore the tarnished US image among many of the more than 1 billion Muslims around the world, damaged by former President George W. Bush’s wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and the treatment of US military detainees.

The choice of Cairo for the speech underscored Obama’s focus on the Middle East, where he faces huge foreign policy challenges, from trying to restart the Israeli-Palestinian peace process to curbing Iran’s nuclear programme.

Obama, who is hoping to build a coalition of Muslim government to back his diplomatic moves, offered no new proposals to advance the Middle East peace process, saying Palestinians “must abandon violence” and urging them acknowledge Israel’s right to exist.

“The United States does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements,” he said. “This construction violates previous agreements and undermines efforts to achieve peace. It is time for these settlements to stop.”

Before the speech, the US president met Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak.

“We discussed how to move forward in a constructive way to bring peace and prosperity to people in the region,” Obama told reporters after the talks with Mubarak, who has ruled Egypt since 1981 and kept a tight lid on opposition.

 

Read the full speech by President Obama:

CAIRO – Text of President Barack Obama’s speech at Cairo University, as provided by CQ Transcriptions.

Source.nation.ke

Posted in AA > News and News analysis | Leave a Comment »

CAIRO – Text of President Barack Obama’s speech at Cairo University, as provided by CQ Transcriptions.

Posted by African Press International on June 4, 2009

Good afternoon. I am honoured to be in the timeless city of Cairo and to be hosted by two remarkable institutions. For over a thousand years, Al-Azhar has had stood as a beacon of Islamic learning. And for over a century, Cairo University has been a source of Egypt’s advancement. Together, you represent the harmony between tradition and progress.

I’m grateful for your hospitality and the hospitality of the people of Egypt. And I’m also proud to carry with me the good will of the American people and a greeting of peace from Muslim communities in my country: Assalamu-alaikum.

We meet at a time of great tension between the United States and Muslims around the world, tension rooted in historical forces that go beyond any current policy debate. The relationship between Islam and the West includes centuries of coexistence and cooperation but also conflict and religious wars.

More recently, tension has been fed by colonialism that denied rights and opportunities to many Muslims and a Cold War in which Muslim majority countries were too often treated as proxies without regard to their own aspirations. Moreover, the sweeping change brought by modernity and globalization led many Muslims to view the West as hostile to the traditions of Islam.

Violent extremists have exploited these tensions in a small but potent minority of Muslims. The attacks of September 11, 2001, and the continued efforts of these extremists to engage in violence against civilians has led some in my country to view Islam as inevitably hostile not only to America and western countries but also to human rights.

All this has bred more fear and more mistrust. So long as our relationship is defined by our differences, we will empower those who sow hatred rather than peace, those who promote conflict rather than the cooperation that can help all of our people achieve justice and prosperity. And this cycle of suspicion and discord must end.

I’ve come here to Cairo to seek a new beginning between the United States and Muslims around the world, one based on mutual interest and mutual respect, and one based upon the truth that America and Islam are not exclusive and need not be in competition. Instead, they overlap and share common principles, principles of justice and progress, tolerance and the dignity of all human beings.

I do so recognizing that change cannot happen overnight. I know there’s been a lot of publicity about this speech, but no single speech can eradicate years of mistrust nor can I answer in the time that I have this afternoon all the complex questions that brought us to this point.

But I am convinced that in order to move forward, we must say openly to each other the things we hold in our hearts and that too often are said only behind closed doors. There must be a sustained effort to listen to each other, to learn from each other, to respect one another, and to seek common ground.

As the Holy Quran tells us, Be conscious of God and speak always the truth.

That is what I will try to do today, to speak the truth as best I can. Humbled by the task before us and firm in my belief that the interests we share as human beings are far more powerful than the forces that drives us apart.

Now, part of this conviction is rooted in my own experience. I’m a Christian. But my father came from a Kenyan family that includes generations of Muslims. As a boy, I spent several years in Indonesia and heard the call of the azaan at the break of dawn and at the fall of dusk.

As a young man, I worked in Chicago communities where many found dignity and peace in their Muslim faith. As a student of history, I also know civilisation’s debt to Islam. It was Islam at places like Al-Azhar that carried the light of learning through so many centuries, paving the way for Europe’s renaissance and enlightenment. It was innovation in Muslim communities…

It was innovation in Muslim communities that developed the order of algebra, our magnetic compass and tools of navigation, our mastery of pens and printing, our understanding of how disease spreads and how it can be healed.

Islamic culture has given us majestic arches and soaring spires, timeless poetry and cherished music, elegant calligraphy and places of peaceful contemplation. And throughout history, Islam has demonstrated through words and deeds the possibilities of religious tolerance and racial equality.

I also know that Islam has always been a part of America’s story. The first nation to recognize my country was Morocco. In signing the Treaty of Tripoli in 1796, our second president, John Adams, wrote,

The United States has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Muslims. And since our founding, American Muslims have enriched the United States.

They have fought in our wars. They have served in our government. They have stood for civil rights. They have started businesses. They have taught at our universities. They’ve excelled in our sports arenas.

They’ve won Nobel Prizes, built our tallest building and lit the Olympic torch. And when the first Muslim American was recently elected to Congress, he took the oath to defend our Constitution using the same holy Quran that one of our founding fathers, Thomas Jefferson, kept in his personal library.

So I have known Islam on three continents before coming to the region where it was first revealed. That experience guides my conviction that partnership between America and Islam must be based on what Islam is, not what it isn’t. And I consider it part of my responsibility as president of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear.

But that same principle must apply to Muslim perceptions of America. Just as…

Just as Muslims do not fit a crude stereotype, America is not the crude stereotype of a self-interested empire. The United States has been one of the greatest sources of progress that the world has ever known. We were born out of revolution against an empire.

We were founded upon the ideal that all are created equal. And we have shed blood and struggled for centuries to give meaning to those words, within our borders and around the world.

We are shaped by every culture. Drawn from every end of the Earth, and dedicated to a simple concept, E pluribus unum: Out of many, one.

Now much has been made of the fact that an African-American with the name Barack Hussein Obama could be elected president.

But my personal story is not so unique. The dream of opportunity for all people has not come true for everyone in America, but its promise exists for all who come to our shores. And that includes nearly 7 million American Muslims in our country today who, by the way, enjoy incomes and educational levels that are higher than the American average.

Moreover, freedom in America is indivisible from the freedom to practice one’s religion. That is why there is a mosque in every state in our union and over 1,200 mosques within our borders. That’s why the United States government has gone to court to protect the right of women and girls to wear the hijab, and to punish those who would deny it.

So let there be no doubt…

… let there be no doubt, Islam is a part of America. And I believe that America holds within her the truth that regardless of race, religion, or station in life, all of us share common aspirations: to live in peace and security, to get an education and to work with dignity, to love our families, our communities, and our God. These things we share. This is the hope of all humanity.

Of course, recognizing our common humanity is only the beginning of our task. Words alone cannot meet the needs of our people. These needs will be met only if we act boldly in the years ahead. And if we understand that the challenges we face are shared and our failure to meet them will hurt us all.

For we have learned from recent experience that when a financial system weakens in one country, prosperity is hurt everywhere. When a new flu infects one human being, all are at risk. When one nation pursues a nuclear weapon, the risk of nuclear attack rises for all nations.

When violent extremists operate in one stretch of mountains, people are endangered across an ocean. When innocents in Bosnia and Darfur are slaughtered, that is a stain on our collective conscience.

That is what it means to share this world in the 21st Century. That is the responsibility we have to one another as human beings. This is a difficult responsibility to embrace, for human history has often been a record of nations and tribes, and, yes, religions subjugating one another in pursuit of their own interests.

Yet in this new age, such attitudes are self-defeating. Given our interdependence, any world order that elevates one nation or group of people over another will inevitably fail. So whatever we think of the past, we must not be prisoners to it. Our problems must be dealt with through partnership, our progress must be shared.

Now, that does not mean we should ignore sources of tension. Indeed, it suggests the opposite. We must face these tensions squarely. And so, in that spirit, let me speak as clearly and as plainly as I can about some specific issues that I believe we must finally confront together.

The first issue that we have to confront is violent extremism in all its forms. In Ankara, I made clear that America is not and never will be at war with Islam.

We will, however, relentlessly confront violent extremists who pose a grave threat to our security because we reject the same thing that people of all faiths reject, the killing of innocent men, women, and children. And it is my first duty as president to protect the American people.

The situation in Afghanistan demonstrates America’s goals and our need to work together. Over seven years ago, the United States pursued Al Qaida and the Taliban with broad international support. We did not go by choice. We went because of necessity. I’m aware that there’s still some who would question or even justify the offense of 9/11. But let us be clear. Al Qaida killed nearly 3,000 people on that day.

The victims were innocent men, women, and children from America and many other nations who had done nothing to harm anybody. And yet Al Qaida chose to ruthlessly murder these people, claimed credit for the attack, and even now states their determination to kill on a massive scale. They have affiliates in many countries and are trying to expand their reach.

These are not opinions to be debated. These are facts to be dealt with. Make no mistake, we do not want to keep our troops in Afghanistan. We see no military — we seek no military bases there. It is agonising for America to lose our young men and women. It is costly and politically difficult to continue this conflict.

We would gladly bring every single one of our troops home if we could be confident that there were not violent extremists in Afghanistan and now Pakistan determined to kill as many Americans as they possibly can. But that is not yet the case.

And that’s why we’re partnering with a coalition of 46 countries. And despite the costs involved, America’s commitment will not weaken. Indeed, none of us should tolerate these extremists.

They have killed in many countries. They have killed people of different faiths but, more than any other, they have killed Muslims. Their actions are irreconcilable with the rights of human beings, the progress of nations, and with Islam.

The Holy Quran teaches that whoever kills an innocent is as — it is as it if has killed all mankind.

And the Holy Quran also says whoever saves a person, it is as if he has saved all mankind.

The enduring faith of over a billion people is so much bigger than the narrow hatred of a few. Islam is not part of the problem in combating violent extremism; it is an important part of promoting peace.

Now, we also know that military power alone is not going solve the problems in Afghanistan and Pakistan. That’s why we plan to invest $1.5 billion each year over the next five years to partner with Pakistanis to build schools and hospitals, roads and businesses, and hundreds of millions to help those who’ve been displaced.

That’s why we are providing more than $2.8 billion to help Afghans develop their economy and deliver services that people depend on.

Now, let me also address the issue of Iraq. Unlike Afghanistan, Iraq was a war of choice that provoked strong differences in my country and around the world.

Although I believe that the Iraqi people are ultimately better off without the tyranny of Saddam Hussein, I also believe that events in Iraq have reminded America of the need to use diplomacy and build international consensus to resolve our problems whenever possible.

Indeed, we can recall the words of Thomas Jefferson, who said, I hope that our wisdom will grow with our power and teach us that the less we use our power, the greater it will be. Today America has a dual responsibility to help Iraq forge a better future and to leave Iraq to Iraqis.

I have made it clear to the Iraqi people…

I have made it clear to the Iraqi people that we pursue no basis and no claim on their territory or resources. Iraq’s sovereignty is its own. And that’s why I ordered the removal of our combat brigades by next August. That is why we will honour our agreement with Iraq’s democratically-elected government to remove combat troops from Iraqi cities by July and to remove all of our troops from Iraq by 2012.

We will help Iraq train its security forces and develop its economy. But we will support a secure and united Iraq as a partner and never as a patron.

And finally, just as America can never tolerate violence by extremists, we must never alter or forget our principles. 9/11 was an enormous trauma to our country. The fear and anger that it provoked was understandable. But in some cases, it led us to act contrary to our traditions and our ideals.

We are taking concrete actions to change course. I have unequivocally prohibited the use of torture by the United States. And I have ordered the prison at Guantanamo Bay closed by early next year.

So America will defend itself, respectful of the sovereignty of nations and the rule of law. And we will do so in partnership with Muslim communities, which are also threatened. The sooner the extremists are isolated and unwelcome in Muslim communities, the sooner we will all be safer.

Now, the second major source of tension that we need to discuss is the situation between Israelis, Palestinians and the Arab world. America’s strong bonds with Israel are well-known. This bond is unbreakable. It is based upon cultural and historical ties and the recognition that the aspiration for a Jewish homeland is rooted in a tragic history that cannot be denied.

Around the world the Jewish people were persecuted for centuries. And anti-Semitism in Europe culminated in an unprecedented holocaust. Tomorrow I will visit Buchenwald, which was part of a network of camps where Jews were enslaved, tortured, shot and gassed to death by the Third Reich.

Six million Jews were killed, more than the entire Jewish population of Israel today. Denying that fact is baseless. It is ignorant, and it is hateful.

It’s about preventing a nuclear arms race in the Middle East that could lead this region and the world down a hugely dangerous path.

Now, I understand those who protest that some countries have weapons that others do not. No single nations should pick and choose which nation holds nuclear weapons. And that’s why I strongly reaffirmed America’s commitment to seek a world in which no nations hold nuclear weapons.

And any nation, including Iran, should have the right to access peaceful nuclear power if it complies with its responsibilities under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. That commitment is at the core of the treaty. And it must be kept for all who fully abide by it. And I am hopeful that all countries in the region can share in this goal.

The fourth issue that I will address is democracy.

I know there has been controversy about the promotion of democracy in recent years. And much of this controversy is connected to the war in Iraq. So let me be clear. No system of government can or should be imposed by one nation by any other. That does not lessen my commitment, however, to governments that reflect the will of the people.

Each nation gives life to this principle in its own way, grounded in the traditions of its own people. America does not presume to know what is best for everyone, just as we would not presume to pick the outcome of a peaceful election.

But I do have an unyielding belief that all people yearn for certain things: the ability to speak your mind and have a say in how you are governed, confidence in the rule of law and the equal administration of justice, government that is transparent and doesn’t steal from the people, the freedom to live as you choose. These are not just American ideas. They are human rights. And that is why we will support them everywhere.

Now, there is no straight line to realise this promise. But this much is clear. Governments that protect these rights are ultimately more stable, successful and secure. Suppressing ideas never succeeds in making them go away.

America respects the right of all peaceful and law-abiding voices to be heard around the world, even if we disagree with them. And we will welcome all elected, peaceful governments, provided they govern with respect for all their people.

This last point is important because there are some who advocate for democracy only when they’re out of power. Once in power, they are ruthless in suppressing the rights of others.

So no matter where it takes hold, government of the people and by the people sets a single standard for all who would hold power. You must maintain your power through consent, not coercion.

You must respect the rights of minorities and participate with a spirit of tolerance and compromise. You must place the interests of your people and the legitimate workings of the political process above your party.

Without these ingredients, elections alone do not make true democracy.

The fifth issue that we must address together is religious freedom. Islam has a proud tradition of tolerance. We see it in the history of Andalusia and Cordoba during the Inquisition. I saw it firsthand as a child in Indonesia where devote Christians worshipped freely in an overwhelmingly Muslim country.

That is the spirit we need today. People in every country should be free to choose and live their faith based upon the persuasion of the mind and the heart and the soul.

This tolerance is essential for religion to thrive. But it’s being challenged in many different ways. Among some Muslims, there’s a disturbing tendency to measure one’s own faith by the rejection of somebody else’s faith.

The richness of religious diversity must be upheld, whether it is for Maronites in Lebanon or the Copts in Egypt.

And if we are being honest, fault lines must be closed among Muslims as well as the divisions between Sunni and Shia have led to tragic violence, particularly in Iraq.

Freedom of religion is central to the ability of peoples to live together. We must always examine the ways in which people protect it. For instance, in the United States, rules on charitable giving have made it harder for Muslims to fulfill their religious obligation.

That’s why I’m committed to work with American Muslims to ensure that they can fulfill zakat. Likewise, it is important for Western countries to avoid impeding Muslim citizens from practicing religion as they see fit, for instance, by dictating what clothes a Muslim woman should wear.

We can’t disguise hostility towards any religion behind the pretense of liberalism. In fact, faith should bring us together. And that’s why we’re forging service projects in America to bring together Christians, Muslims, and Jews.

That’s why we welcome efforts like Saudi Arabian King Abdullah’s interfaith dialogue and Turkey’s leadership in the Alliance of Civilizations.

Around the world, we can turn dialogue into interfaith service so bridges between peoples lead to action, whether it is combating malaria in Africa or providing relief after a natural disaster.

The sixth issue — the sixth issue that I want to address is women’s rights.

I know, and you can tell from this audience, that there is a healthy debate about this issue. I reject the view of some in the West that a woman who chooses to cover her hair is somehow less equal. But I do believe that a woman who is denied an education is denied equality.

And it is no coincidence that countries where women are well- educated are far more likely to be prosperous.

Now let me be clear, issues of women’s equality are by no means simply an issue for Islam. In Turkey, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Indonesia, we’ve seen Muslim-majority countries elect a woman to lead.

Meanwhile, the struggle for women’s equality continues in many aspects of American life and in countries around the world. I am convinced that our daughters can contribute just as much to society as our sons.

Our common prosperity will be advanced by allowing all humanity, men and women, to reach their full potential. I do not believe that women must make the same choices as men in order to be equal. And I respect those women who choose to live their lives in traditional roles. But it should be their choice.

That is why the United States will partner with any Muslim- majority country to support expanded literacy for girls and to help young women pursue employment through micro-financing that helps people live their dreams.

Finally, I want to discuss economic development and opportunity. I know that for many, the face of globalization is contradictory. The Internet and television can bring knowledge and information but also offensive sexuality and mindless violence into the home.

Trade can bring new wealth and opportunities but also huge disruptions and change in communities. In all nations, including America, this change can bring fear; fear that, because of modernity, we lose control over our economic choices, our politics, and most importantly, our identities, those things we most cherish about our communities, our families, our traditions, and our faith.

But I also know that human progress cannot be denied. There need not be contradictions between development and tradition. Countries like Japan and South Korea grew their economies enormously while maintaining distinct cultures. The same is true for the astonishing progress within Muslim majority countries from Kuala Lumpur to Dubai.

In ancient times and in our times, Muslim communities have been at the forefront of innovation and education. And this is important because no development strategy can be based only upon what comes out of the ground nor can it be sustained while young people are out of work.

Many Gulf States have enjoyed great wealth as a consequence of oil, and some are beginning to focus it on broader development. But all of us must recognize that education and innovation will be the currency of the 21st century. And in too…

And in too many Muslim communities, there remains underinvestment in these areas. I am emphasizing such investment within my own country. And while America, in the past, has focused on oil and gas when it comes to this part of the world, we new seek a broader engagement.

On education, we will expand change programs and increase scholarships like the one that brought my father to America.

At the same time, we will encourage more Americans to study in Muslim communities. And we will match promising Muslim students are internships in America, invest in online learning for teachers and children around the world and create a new, online network so a young person in Kansas can communicate instantly with a young person in Cairo.

On economic development, we will create a new core of business volunteers to partner with counterparts in Muslim majority countries.

And I will host a summit on entrepreneurship this year to identify how we can deepen ties between business leaders, foundations, and social entrepreneurs in the United States and Muslim communities around the world.

On science and technology, we will launch a new fund to support technological development in Muslim majority country and to help transfer ideas to the marketplace so they can create more jobs.

We will open centres of scientific excellence in Africa, the Middle East, and Southeast Asia and appoint new science envoys to collaborate on programs that develop new sources of energy, create green jobs, digitize records, clean water, grow new crops.

Today, I’m announcing a new global effort with the organization of the Islamic Conference to eradicate polio. And we will also expand partnerships with Muslim communities to promote child and maternal health.

All these things must be done in partnership. Americans are ready to join with citizens and governments, community organizations, religious leaders, and businesses in Muslim communities around the world to help our people pursue a better life.

The issues that I have described will not be easy to address, but we have a responsibility to join together to behalf of the world that we seek, a world where extremists no longer threaten our people and American troops have come home; a world where Israelis and Palestinians are each secure in a state of their own and nuclear energy is used for peaceful purposes, a world where governments serve their citizens and the rights of all God’s children are respected.

Those are mutual interests. That is the world we seek. But we can only achieve it together. I know there are many, Muslim and non-Muslim, who question whether we can forge this new beginning. Some are eager to stoke the flames of division and to stand in the way of progress. Some suggest that it isn’t worth the effort that we are fated to disagree and civilizations are doomed to clash.

Many more are simply sceptical that real change can occur. There is so much fear, so much mistrust that has built up over the years. But if we choose to be bound by the past, we will never move forward. And I want to particularly say this to young people of every faith in every country. You more than anyone have the ability to re-imagine the world, the remake this world.

All of us share this world for but a brief moment in time. The question is whether we spend that time focused on what pushes us apart or whether we commit ourselves to an effort, a sustained effort to find common ground, to focus on the future we seek for our children and to respect the dignity of all human beings.

It’s easier to start wars than to end them. It’s easier to blame others than to look inward. It’s easier to see what is different about someone than to find the things we share. But we should choose the right path, not just the easy path. There is one rule that lies at the heart of every religion, that we do unto others as we would have them do unto us.

This truth transcends nations and peoples, a belief that isn’t new, that isn’t black or white or brown, that isn’t Christian or Muslim or Jew. It’s a belief that pulsed in the cradle of civilization and that still beats in the hearts of billions around the world. It’s a faith in other people. And it’s what brought me here today.

We have the power to make the world we seek, but only if we have the courage to make a new beginning, keeping in mind what has been written. The Holy Quran tells us, Mankind, we have created you male and a female. And we have made you into nations and tribes so that you may know one another.

The Talmud tells us, The whole of the Torah is for the purpose of promoting peace.

The Holy Bible tells us, Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God.

The people of the world can live together in peace. We know that is God’s vision. Now that must be our work here on Earth.

Thank you. And may God’s peace be upon you. Thank you very much.

Thank you.

Posted in AA > News and News analysis | Leave a Comment »

Malawi main opposition party refuses to endorse poll results

Posted by African Press International on June 4, 2009

By Prince Jamali

John TemboThree weeks after Malawi held her fourth multiparty democratic General Elections on May 19, dust seems not to be settling down, with main opposition party, Malawi Congress (MCP) in the Southern African country refusing to endorse the outcome of the polls, claiming they were fraudulent.

Veteran Politician, John Tembo (photo>) who leads the MCP told API outside the country’s National Assembly soon after taking an oath for the 47year as a law maker, that his party was not ready to endorse the poll results and the leadership of President Bingu wa Mutharika, until the Electoral body, Malawi Electoral Commission (MEC) bowed down to pressure from the party to recount the votes which were cast.

We have every reason that there were serious anomalies during the elections, which have cast doubt on the outcome. We don’t think President Mutharika is the rightful winner. Until, the anomalies are normalized, we refuse to endorse the results and accept the legitimacy of President Mutharika, Tembo, who is the country’s longest, serving legislator, said.

In the elections, Tembo, who entered into an electoral alliance with former ruling party, United Democratic Front (UDF) of former President Bakili Muluzi, got about 1.3million votes behind Mutharika, who amassed a record 2.9 million votes, giving him a landslide victory for his second and last term of office.

In the parliamentary race, the governing Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), a party formed by Mutharika in 2005 after falling out with his mentor now turned nemesis, Muluzi, scored another record of 114 parliamentarians seats against MCP’s 26. The DPP now calls the shots in the 193 seat National Assembly, having acquired two thirds majority enough to change the laws of the country without facing any obstacles.

Tembo alongside his party has since filed a case in the High Court of Malawi disputing the poll results.

The MCP leader who was a strong man during the 30 year dictatorial regime of fallen dictator, Hastings Kamuzu Banda, has said that the outcome of the May 19 elections in the country were flawed to the extent that the country’s democratic integrity has been put at stake.

“The party would like to make very clear to the people of Malawi that in the event that such anomalies are deemed to have been non-existent or of immaterial impact to the final outcome of the elections, and that the results as declared by the Malawi Electoral Commission are indeed  are indeed true and exact expression of the political will of the people of Malawi, then we as a party will respect that democratic voice acknowledge and offer our congratulations to the rightfully elected members of the legislative and executive arms of the Republic of Malawi, Tembo, said.

Meanwhile President Mutharika has maintained that he won the polls and has challenged the 77 year old politician and his party to go ahead with any litigation and they can even go to the International Court of Justice to challenge the outcome of the polls.

I can even advise him to go International Court of Justice, but the results would remain the same, I won, said Mutharika, who government is highly credited to have turned around the country’s wheels of Agriculture, said in his first reaction to Tambo’s claims of rigging.

Since 1994, when multiparty democratic system was re-introduced, the Malawi Congress Party has enjoyed the highest number of parliamentarians. During the 2004 General Elections, Tembo trailed third to Mutharika.

All the seven presidential candidates except Tembo have conceded defeat and congratulated Mutharika for his victory.

About 5,871,819 eligible Malawians were registered for the polls, but only 4,600,757 turned up to vote.

END

Posted in AA > News and News analysis | Leave a Comment »

Heterosexual Pride Month – Most happies believe its not right to force their views of marriage and happiness on others. On this point, President Obama concurs

Posted by African Press International on June 4, 2009

   

 

 

 


Heterosexual Pride Month

 


Obama came through on his campaign theme of ‘equality’ Monday by proclaiming June as “Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Pride Month”. Obama lauded what he calls “the determination and dedication” of the LGBT movement.

 
In the same spirit of equality, I’d like to propose July to be designated as Heterosexual Pride Month in hopes of drawing attention to and appreciation for traditional moral values and marriage as practiced by heterosexuals. Heterosexual Pride Month could be an occasion to focus on the joys of being heterosexual and monogamous. And the determined and dedicated Americans who practice both.
 
Heterosexuals, whom I’ll call ‘happies’, seldom have their voices heard or their sexual practices mentioned. Although a majority of Americans are happies, they are loath to flaunt their bedroom habits in public. Blame an ingrained sense of outdated modesty.
 
Most happies are advocates of traditional marriage and cling to the notion that sex should be a private affair. Some even believe that sex is a matter between a man and his wife and believe the government has no right to dictate or influence what they do in the privacy of their own bedrooms. 
 
Since the traditional family has long been considered a vital component of civil society, we could also use Heterosexual Pride Month to emphasize and explore the social compact that traditional marriage used to signify. 
  
 
Now that Obama has brought tolerance back into vogue, I recommend using Heterosexual Pride Month as an occasion to voice the legitimate moral objections many Americans (57%) have to gay marriage and the plethora of sexual practices that Obama, in the name of equality, is demanding all Americans not only accept, but endorse.
 
Another panel discussion during Heterosexual Pride Month could deal with wether or not gender should be optional. We could then explore the harmful effects of indoctrinating impressionable young children into the idea that gender and/or sexuality is merely a lifestyle option. Special emphasis could be placed on the documented detrimental effects of the gay lifestyle.
 
  
Heterosexual Pride Month will necessarily present quite a challenge, as many heterosexual couples these days are so busy working to pay their taxes and raising children that many of them just don’t have the time to devote to activism.
 
Besides, most happies believe its not right to force their views of marriage and happiness on others. On this point, President Obama concurs. Just last Monday he said that the United States cannot impose its values on other countries. I’m sure he also meant ‘on other citizens.’ This could be another excellent topic for discussion.
 
In the spirit of inclusion, I’d like to extend an invitation to the LGBT movement to join us happies in making Heterosexual Pride Month a reality. With all of us working together we could have a real multicultural event with lots and lots of dialogue.
 

We could then go on to discuss the physical and mental health implications of gay vs. happy, and finish off with a quick overview of the Constitution and the role of government in dictating moralality.

I’d be willing to host a discussion on the topic of homophobia, and explore why 98% of happies are automatically labeled homophobic if they dare to comment on what they legitimately consider an aberrant lifestyle.

Some happies go even further and believe that God made Adam and Eve (not Adam and Steve) for a darn good reason. Most happies also believe that their sexual habits should not be thrust into the faces of those who feel differently. They call it, well, just good manners. Both of these views would be excellent topics for discussion during Heterosexual Pride Month.

 

 

Nancy Morgan is a colummnist and news editor for  RightBias

She lives ‘happily’ in South Carolina

Posted in AA > News and News analysis | Leave a Comment »

African Press to sue US Lawyer Philip Berg, Canadian Lawyer Bluteau, Author Corsi and Fox News Network in connection with Obama’s identity and the Michelle taped conversation

Posted by African Press International on June 4, 2009

GENUINE COMMENTS ALLOWED ON THIS POST

 

It has taken time to come to a conclusion on what to do with that which took place during the month of October last year when the Michelle Obama tape came to the scene and the urge to get President Obama’s real identity after the Imam surfaced and stated he was ready to document where Obama was born in Mombasa.

Many groups and persons got very, and some individuals went as far as almost forging documents in their efforts to ruin Obama’s Presidential election. As all that was happening, some persons in the name of US Lawyer Philip Berg and Writer Corsi did all they could to establish evidence that was to be used to stop Obama from getting the presidency by securing API’s trust. Other individuals (three of them) - Canadian lawyer Bluteau and two Fox News Network representatives – a man and woman did their best to obtain from API the Michelle Obama tape and in the end decided to ignore the deal entered to by the parties (API and Fox News Network).

The verification of the voice in the tape was done by one of the lawyers and decision taken to have it deposited in three places, but unfortunately, the guardians of the three places chose to do the contrary by not having the tape aired as agreed.

It came to pass that some of the said individuals decided to bargain for the sale of the tape to enrich themselves. Others decided to keep it in order to be used in satisfying private interests, as evidence in court, and in support of a new book project on Obama, in readiness to destroy his chances in the next Presidential elections should he choose to run for the second term in office. The strategy was born after these individuals realised that Obama was winning last years’ elections.

 Agreements and evidence on what transpired between the 15th October 2008 and January 18th, 2009:

The court will now be presented with the following;

  • The agreement between API and the US Lawyer Philip Berg
  • The agreement between API and the Canadian Lawyer Bluteau
  • The communication between API and Mr Corsi
  • The communication between API and the two Fox News Network journalists
  • The verification document from the lawyer who verified that the voice in the tape belongs to Michelle Obama as earlier stated.
  • Documents to indicate deals made in the US and Canada concerning the Michelle Obama tape.

API is also considering whether to publish the above mentioned documents on this site before presenting them to the court or immediately after having filed them in court.

Careful study on what to do in every step taken by API is important so that the documents are not rendered irrelevant by the court if made public prematurely before the other parties are accorded the opportunity to have their say on the said documents being used as evidence in the case.

 

By Chief Editor Korir/ African Press International (API)

Posted in AA > News and News analysis | Leave a Comment »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 186 other followers

%d bloggers like this: