Why is the US President Obama allowing his diplomat to continue urinating on the Kenyans? Why is he not recalling him or does he like to see his fatherland destabilised by his envoy to Kenya?
Is Obama angry at his fatherland because his father abandoned him when he was a little boy? He knows the damage ambassador Ranneberger is doing to Kenya and yet he lets him continue his crusade.
Imagine if the Kenyan ambassador to Washington came up with a cooked dossier touching on some US ministers just like Ranneberger has done in Kenya. He would be sent to Kenya immediately. But Kenya is not acting on the US ambassador who has damaged many political careers by naming some Kenyan leaders as drug traffickers without providing concrete evidence.
How long will the Kenyan leadership entertain nonsensical diplomacy practised by diplomats whose intent is to damage the country using money to destabilise the government? Is it not time they are told to either follow the rules of diplomacy and respect the host country or leave?
The US Ambassador messed up Kenya by distributing money to the youth in an effort to destabilise President Kibaki’s government. The move angered Kibaki who during the Independence celebrations on the 12th december told off the envoy.
Now that the Kenyan Parliamentarians have passed a resolution that will enable Kenya to cut ties with the ICC, a group of envoys are staring to pork their noses into the country’s internal affairs as if the leaders are not able to lead the country.
It is reported by Daily Nation Kenya that the envoys in question have urged the government to allow ICC’ prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo to go on to prosecute the six people that he believes bear the responsibility for the post-election violence. It is also reported that they are calling for reforms in the Kenya Judiciary to try other suspects in connection with the same violence.
In a statement seen to be interfering with the running of the country’s internal affairs, the envoys say, “Kenya has been rebuilding its international image since the post-election violence. Withdrawal from the ICC process potentially risks all this,” the envoys from the United Kingdom, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Greece, Italy, the Republic of Korea, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden and Switzerland.”
What are they fearing if Kenya cuts ties with the ICC and remain like the United States of America who has opted not be ICC member.
Remaining in the ICC undermines the sovereignty of Kenya and gives way to the Western envoys to continue fooling Kenyan leaders pretending to like them while at night they send bad information to their bosses calling Kenyan leaders all sorts of bad names as has been revealed by the WikiLeaks.
Envoys in Kenya are opening their mouths all the time. They should be told to use their mouths right and shut up, leaving the country’s affairs to the people it belongs to. Kenyans are not a primitive people wanting advise from envoys on every issue.
By Chief editor Korir, African Press International.