African Press International (API)

"Daily Online News Channel".

Archive for March 24th, 2012

ICC verdict on Lubanga hailed. Why not bring Nkunda to ICC also – he committed the same crimes.

Posted by African Press International on March 24, 2012

DRC-UGANDA: Congolese refugees hail Lubanga verdict

Some 89,949 Congolese refugees were living in Uganda as of 1 February

ISINGIRO,  – Congolese refugees in Oruchinga camp, southwestern Uganda, have welcomed the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) guilty verdict against former Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) rebel leader Thomas Lubanga. Some of the refugees are survivors of attacks by Lubanga’s forces.

On 14 March, Lubanga was convicted of the war crimes of conscripting and enlisting children under the age of 15 and using them to take part in hostilities.

“All things Lubanga did were bad. He took away the riches of the Congolese people by force. I am happy he has been found guilty for his atrocities and crimes,” said Mark Bolikango, 18, who fled to Uganda from Goma in eastern DRC. “What I don’t know is whether my mother and sister have HIV/AIDS; [Lubanga’s] soldiers raped them in front of me.”

Francis Tumba Pandemoya who fled Bunia, the main town in the northeastern region of Ituri where Lubanga’s forces were active, said: “It’s a wonderful decision by the ICC. Lubanga recruited Congolese children to become soldiers and ordered them to commit several atrocities and war crimes… Lubanga was a killer. His militia killed the Congolese and raped women. I want him to be jailed for 25 years. Others will learn from it.”

According to Peter Iyolo, formerly from Bunia’s Wacha area, too many Congolese are in Uganda as refugees because of Lubanga’s atrocities. “We fled our country because of war,” he said.

As of 1 February, some 89,949 Congolese refugees were living in Uganda, according to the UN Refugee Agency. But the number is steadily rising with dozens of refugees arriving in Uganda every day from parts of eastern DRC.

Warning

Some refugees said they were optimistic Lubanga’s conviction will deter other militia leaders and are calling on the ICC to cast its net wider. “It’s a warning to the remaining criminals who are still continuing to recruit children and killing our people. If you are a criminal, one day you will be arrested, prosecuted and convicted,” said Salome Keza, a refugee. 

A nursing mother at the refugee camp said: “I am tired of people laughing at us as refugees. I believe after Lubanga’s conviction, the guns will go silent. We need to return; it’s not easy to live as a refugee.” 

“Was he [Lubanga] the only one who committed atrocities in Congo? All perpetrators of violence and atrocities in Congo must be arrested and held accountable. Massacres and mayhem are still continuing,” said Furaha Kavira, who hails from North Kivu.

Joseph Akonkwa, who fled his village near Bukavu in South Kivu Province, was more skeptical. “Laurent Nkunda [a former leader of another DRC rebel group, now thought to be under house arrest in Rwanda] committed serious atrocities in Congo. He killed, and looted minerals. Why hasn’t he been taken to the ICC? Is it because Lubanga killed UN troops?” he asked, referring to his alleged role in the 2005 killing of nine Bangladeshi blue helmets in Ituri.

“Recruiting children into the army by Lubanga versus killing and the looting of our resources that Nkunda did – which one is good?” he asked.

Nkunda was arrested on 22 January 2009 as he tried to escape a joint Congolese-Rwandan military offensive. He claimed to be protecting minority Tutsis in the east from the Forces démocratique pour la libération de Rwanda (FDLR), which included the Hutu militia blamed for the 1994 Rwandan genocide. 

Lubanga’s trial was the first to be decided by the ICC; refugees and analysts are calling for more arrests and convictions. 

so/aw/cb source www.irinnews.org

About these ads

Posted in AA > News and News analysis | Leave a Comment »

Outh Sudanese returning home get little help from their new government

Posted by African Press International on March 24, 2012

SOUTH SUDAN: World’s newest state offers little for thousands of returnees

Heading home at last – but many challenges lie ahead

WAU,  – They have returned in their hundreds of thousands, by train, barge, bus and plane, often after decades of war-enforced absence; but coming home to what recently, and euphorically, became the world’s newest state, the Republic of South Sudan, is often the beginning of yet another chapter of struggle and destitution.

On one of the main roads in Wau, a railhead town held by Khartoum throughout the 1983-2005 civil war which devastated much of what was then called southern Sudan and which put two million people to flight, there is an old poster that reads: “Vote for separation to become first class citizens in your own country and say bye-bye to repression and marginalization.”

In January 2011, 98 percent of southerners complied with that injunction and in July a new flag was raised in the capital, Juba, as good riddance was finally bid to rule from distant Khartoum. Just as they had upon the 2005 signing of the comprehensive peace accord, long-absent southerners headed home in droves.

In August 2011 a passenger train arrived in Wau from Khartoum for the first time in years; it was packed with jubilant returnees eager to enjoy the fruits of long yearned-for peace and freedom.

For one of those passengers, 42-year-old auto mechanic Charles John, these fruits have yet to ripen. Since his arrival, he, his wife and six children have been living in a warehouse near the town’s railway station. While only a few dozen people lived in what is locally termed the “hangar” when IRIN visited in mid-March, the building would soon be jam-packed with passengers from another train that pulled into Wau a few days later.

“I decided to come back to my own country because I was a foreigner [in Khartoum] and faced discrimination. We were not welcomed; if we built a home we would be chased away after two or three years. This happened many times,” John explained.

“I was happy to come back. I expected a better life, with school for the children and a better chance of getting a job. But when I arrived, things turned out differently. I have no job, I am still in the hangar, the children are not in school and I am still waiting for my plot. I don’t know when I will get it,” he said.

Complicated plot allocation

A parcel of land is among the incentives for return promoted by South Sudan’s government. But the process is complicated, involving shuffling paperwork between the Relief and Rehabilitation Commission, and the ministries of social affairs and of physical infrastructure. In the absence of clear national land policy guidelines, decisions are often ultimately made on an ad-hoc basis by local chiefs. 

In some areas, returnees have been asked to prove their historical ties to a place before they are allocated land there. For those who may have been away for 30 years, providing such documentation is impossible. 


Photo: Anthony Morland/IRIN
Return interrupted: many who have come back to South Sudan have to wait weeks or months for land allocations

Such long absences have often been spent in urban environments such as Khartoum, while allocated plots tend to be in rural areas with little or no amenities or commercial opportunities, increasing the hardships of host communities in receiving areas. 

According to Refugees International, government development plans treat “the return and reintegration of hundreds of thousands of people as a short-term issue, requiring only a food package and assistance with shelter. However, this assistance, valuable as it is, does not help the returnees to integrate into South Sudan’s social, political and economic life.”

An added hurdle is the low rates of literacy among returnees, 60 percent of whom are under the age of 18. Most of those who attended school while in Khartoum would have been taught in Arabic and so have a low level of the English which would help them get ahead on their return to South Sudan. 

Moving back is particularly difficult for vulnerable returnees, such as war-widowed hangar resident Helena Elario Nur, who is blind. Like more than 23,000 people, she returned to South Sudan with the assistance of the International Organization for Migration. Some 360,000 people returned in 2011.

“I am just waiting for my plot. Life here is very difficult. I think Khartoum was better than this because I have just arrived and have not adapted to life here. In Khartoum, some churches helped me. When I got here I was given some rations by the World Food Programme, but they ran out a week ago. I try to get by selling a bit of dried okra, but it’s hard to find food for the children.”

Across South Sudan, poor harvests, rising food prices, the closure of the border with Sudan, and several armed conflicts have conspired to leave 4.7 million people in need of food aid this year.

Decades of civil war, which first erupted in the mid 1950s, prevented any significant development in the south, where only a minority has access to basic infrastructure such as rainproof roads, health centres and education.

And the new government’s capacity to meet the simplest needs of its eight million citizens has been drastically eroded by its January decision, amid a revenue-sharing row with Sudan, to shut down the flow of oil that accounted for 98 percent of its revenue. A series of austerity measures will not change the fact that the government will run out of money in June.


Photo: Andrew Green/IRIN
Starting from scratch: returnees build a new home in the settlement of Alel Chok, near Wau

Another 120,000 southerners are expected to return voluntarily from Sudan in the coming months. And the exodus could be considerably larger: southerners living in Sudan, even those who were born there, were denied Sudanese citizenship when the country split in two, and were given a deadline of 8 April to “regularize” their status or leave.

Deal not yet implemented

Fears of such a mass movement southwards were partly assuaged earlier this month when both governments agreed in principle that each other’s citizens would enjoy rights of residence, employment, free movement and to buy and sell property. 

But this deal has yet to be implemented, leaving open the possibility of vast numbers of southerners, up to 10,000 a day according to CARE, an NGO, descending on places like Renk - a border town and returnee way station in the northeast of South Sudan – at a time when rains and other logistical constraints would prevent onward transportation to their places of origin.

A few kilometers from Wau lies the new settlement of Alel Chock, which is populated by some of those who have been allocated land by the local authorities. Thanks to international aid agencies, it boasts water pumps, a health clinic and a school building, facilities that make its residents better off than 60 percent of South Sudan’s citizens.

But as new arrival Abdel Abdullah Afrangi, a 57-year-old chemical technician who left southern Sudan in 1968, told IRIN, even with such rare amenities, starting a new life here is daunting prospect.

“The problem we are facing is joblessness. Most of us are skilled workers: electricians, carpenters and the like. But we have no source of income. I am thinking of going somewhere to get a job, but I must prepare my plot, I can’t just abandon it,” he said.

“We want the government to look after our children, who are our future. But the school is not functioning properly and they are not well fed,” he added.

Despite the hardships of homecoming, almost all of the returnees who spoke to IRIN in Wau said they would remain in South Sudan.

“I have hope for the future, that things will get better,” said John.

“I won’t go back to Khartoum unless there is war.”

am/cb
source www.irinnews.org

Posted in AA > News and News analysis | Leave a Comment »

Largest ever cooperation agreement between Norway and Romania

Posted by African Press International on March 24, 2012

Romania and Norway have entered into their largest ever cooperation agreement. In the new round of funding of the EEA and Norway Grants, NOK 2.3 billion has been allocated to programmes and projects in Romania. Priority has been given to strengthening the justice and home affairs sector and improving the situation for the Roma population.

Norwegian Minister of Foreign Affairs Jonas Gahr Støre commented, “There is close contact and cooperation between Norway and Romania. The funds provided in this new round of the EEA and Norway Grants will further strengthen our contact in many areas.”

Romania is facing considerable challenges within its justice and home affairs sector. Support for measures to combat organised crime and human trafficking have therefore been given priority. Funding will also be used to strengthen the courts and the judicial system, and to improve standards in the Romanian criminal and probation services. Projects to combat domestic violence will also receive funding. The Norwegian Police Directorate, the Norwegian Courts Administration and Correctional Services will be involved in this work, as will the Council of Europe. A total of NOK 200 million has been allocated to this sector.

There is a growing interest from Norwegian companies to invest in Romania. Norwegian companies have good opportunities for cooperating with Romanian partners under the Green Industry Innovation programme. Funding from the Norway Grants will be used to support business ideas and business development based on environmental technology. A total of around NOK 180 million has been allocated to this programme. In addition, NOK 110 million has been allocated to a programme in the maritime sector. Both these programmes will be administered by Innovation Norway.

The Roma population is a large minority group in Romania. The EEA and Norway Grants will be used to improve the situation of the Roma population through a number of different measures. A programme for children and young people at risk will focus on the regions where a large proportion of the population are Roma. Around NOK 170 million  has been allocated to projects to reduce discrimination, improve integration and reduce social and economic disparities. The Council of Europe will be an important partner in this work. In addition, at least 10 % of the funding in most programmes will be set aside for improving conditions for the Roma population.

Support to civil society under the Grants is also being stepped up. The NOK 225 million NGO Fund will contribute to strengthening civil society in Romania and to increasing the participation of NGOs in social development. It will focus in particular on projects targeting children and young people, vulnerable groups and minorities, including the Roma population.

Gry Larsen, State Secretary at the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, said, “Norway has a great interest in expanding the cooperation with Romania. It is positive to see that this keen interest exists on both sides.” Ms Larsen signed the MoU in Bucharest together with the Romanian Minister of European Affairs this afternoon.

Through the EEA and Norway Grants, Norway makes an important contribution to reducing social and economic disparities in the EEA. The Grants are also intended to strengthen cooperation and contact between Norway and the beneficiary countries. The EEA and Norway Grants amount to around NOK 14 billion for the period 2009-14. Norway provides 97 % of the funding for the Grants, and Iceland and Liechtenstein provide the rest.

 

end

source mfa.no

Posted in AA > News and News analysis | Leave a Comment »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 184 other followers

%d bloggers like this: